Peer Guardian 2

[The Ponzzz]

Thanks for the suggestion of using this software. I had always had the intentions of using it, but always forgot. I've already blocked a ton with it and I'm not even downloading, just seeding a few freeware programs.

[iJin]

Link?

Edit: Cause I'm lazy.

[Drew]

I've used it for years but it's anything but stable in Vista. I feel naked downloading without it.

[Drew]

Link?

Edit: Cause I'm lazy.

http://phoenixlabs.org/

[radamanthys]

I don't use antivirus, firewall or any other kind of protection software. Never had a problem.

*shrug*

[iJin]

http://phoenixlabs.org/

Thanks yo.

[The Ponzzz]

This isn't a firewall, virus protector or anything like that. This is to block unwanted IPs from looking in my file sharing.

[Drew]

I don't use antivirus, firewall or any other kind of protection software. Never had a problem.

*shrug*




Recent findings by researchers from the University of California, Riverside, show that 15% of the IPs people connect to on the Gnutella P2P network are blocked by blocklist applications such as PeerGuardian. Statistics like this do not prove anything about the effectiveness of these lists, however, according to an insider who worked for several anti-piracy organizations, blocklists significantly decrease the risk of getting caught by the MPAA or RIAA.

In a recently published paper, the researchers analyzed the results of a large scale experiment where they examined the number of hits they received from blocklisted IPs in a real P2P network. For a period of 90 days the researchers collected data using three differnet blocklists (PeerGuardian, Bluetack, and Trusty Files) on the Gnutella Network.

Their main conclusion: a user who is not using blocklist software is practically guaranteed to be monitored.

Other conclusions from their research are:

1. 5 blocklist ranges encountered during the experiments contribute to nearly 94% of all the blocklist hits.
2. Most blocklisted IPs belong to government or corporate organizations.
3. Very few blocklisted IPs belong directly to content providers such as record labels.

The researchers also note that the top 15 most encountered IPs operate from so called BOGON IP ranges, which can’t be traced back to a specific owner. This suggests that these sources deliberately want to stay anonymous, which could indicate that they are up to something.

The paper has some interesting findings, and does provide some insight into the workings of blocklists. However, it doesn’t say much about the accuracy and effectiveness of these blocklists.

In an attempt to find an answer, TorrentFreak asked an expert in the field, who worked with several anti-piracy organizations, how effective these lists are. His guess was that approximately 75 - 80% of IPs used by the anti-piracy companies he worked with are on these blocklists. This means that they offer some protection, but that they’re not foolproof.

The cat-and-mouse game between anti-piracy organizations and blocklist managers such as Bluetack will probably continue for a while.



http://torrentfreak.com/do-p2p-blocklists-keep-you-safe/

[Bobmuhthol]

Solution: Usenet is better than torrents.

[The Ponzzz]

I'll need to check usenet out, I have heard nothing bad about it.

[Drew]

Solution: Usenet is better than torrents.

Solution: Torrents are free, Usenet is not for half the country.

[Bobmuhthol]

Yeah, I hope you enjoy your free downloads on the internet connection you pay for. My $11/mo for unlimited bandwidth that caps my download speed is well worth it.