View Full Version : bye bye OJ
Solkern
10-04-2008, 06:23 AM
Take it easy in the big house
Parkbandit
10-04-2008, 07:57 AM
Racist
Nieninque
10-04-2008, 08:01 AM
Kharma
Parkbandit
10-04-2008, 08:01 AM
13 years to the day of his previous aquittal? Come on.. that's too much of a coincidence.
Sean of the Thread
10-04-2008, 08:31 AM
He think he got shafted personally.
ElanthianSiren
10-04-2008, 08:35 AM
IMO there is definitely bias against him, but I also think that happens when you write books like, "If I did it..."
Durgrimst
10-04-2008, 08:50 AM
IMO there is definitely bias against him, but I also think that happens when you write books like, "If I did it..."
OJ is broke as shit, he had to write that book just to make money. Im not gonna lie, he is a sketchy dude, but he was just trying to make some money when he wrote that.
Clove
10-04-2008, 09:19 AM
OJ is broke as shit, he had to write that book just to make money. Im not gonna lie, he is a sketchy dude, but he was just trying to make some money when he wrote that.If he had gone to jail he wouldn't have needed money.
Ilvane
10-04-2008, 09:24 AM
How many people actually thought he would be found innocent? Please.
I mean, people wanted him in jail, there is no way in hell he could have got a fair trial if he wanted to.
The guys who he hung with were pretty shady, and there were deals thrown around everywhere so everyone else got it easy as long as they could get OJ.
Ridiculous.
He was found not guilty for that murder. Technically, he shouldn't face consequences for that legally...even if we all think he's guilty.
Angela
Sean of the Thread
10-04-2008, 10:08 AM
How many people actually thought he would be found innocent? Please.
I mean, people wanted him in jail, there is no way in hell he could have got a fair trial if he wanted to.
The guys who he hung with were pretty shady, and there were deals thrown around everywhere so everyone else got it easy as long as they could get OJ.
Ridiculous.
He was found not guilty for that murder. Technically, he shouldn't face consequences for that legally...even if we all think he's guilty.
Angela
"we" all don't think he's guilty of the murders.
And fair trial possible or not given the circumstances of the publics perception of him he got screwed on this one and the jury should be ashamed at this point.
I know you're just talking out your ass so I won't give you too hard of a time.
Kefka
10-04-2008, 11:50 AM
So when are we gonna crucify Robert Blake?
So when are we gonna crucify Robert Blake?
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?t=12235
Kefka
10-04-2008, 12:00 PM
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?t=12235
No outrage there
No outrage there
You were around back then. I didnt see you posting in that thread.
*Where was your outrage?
Kefka
10-04-2008, 12:24 PM
You were around back then. I didnt see you posting in that thread.
*Where was your outrage?
I'd have to be surprised to be outraged.
OJ - Outrage
Blake - No outrage
Bonds - Outrage
Clemens - No outrage
White male guns down two men on neighbor's property - innocent
Black male shoots guy threatening to get his son on his property - guilty
It's the American Way!
I'd have to be surprised to be outraged.
OJ - Outrage
Blake - No outrage
Bonds - Outrage
Clemens - No outrage
White male guns down two men on neighbor's property - innocent
Black male shoots guy threatening to get his son on his property - guilty
It's the American Way!
Welcome to the party.
*So by your inaction in the Blake thread, you're ok with that.
PS. There was plenty of outrage with Clemens.
Solkern
10-04-2008, 12:40 PM
Welcome to the party.
*So by your inaction in the Blake thread, you're ok with that.
PS. There was plenty of outrage with Clemens.
compared to barry bonds?
fuck no there wasn't
compared to barry bonds?
fuck no there wasn't
I guess he just got more coverage here in Houston. From a Houston media standpoint - Clemens received way more coverage than Bonds.
Sean of the Thread
10-04-2008, 12:48 PM
Here it was all Barry. As well on national outlets such as CNN MSN and even the Rome show. He got slaughtered.
Kefka
10-04-2008, 12:55 PM
*So by your inaction in the Blake thread, you're ok with that.
Did I post here regularly at that time? 790 posts since 2003. Apparently, I didn't know of the thread's existence. Then again, with so few responses in that particular thread, it most likely sunk to the next page before I was able to login.
Did I post here regularly at that time? 790 posts since 2003. Apparently, I didn't know of the thread's existence. Then again, with so few responses in that particular thread, it most likely sunk to the next page before I was able to login.
Whatever lets you sleep at night.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.