Why so quiet?

[Parkbandit]

WTF?

I busted my ass to get Ashliana back to us... and the political folder is basically dead.

WTF?

People.. I've done my part.. time for a couple of you to step up and help out. This is supposed to be a fucking team effort.

[Gan]

I've been bussier than a one legged man in a butt kicking contest.

I have posted a few today, but have been totally slacking for the past week or so.

[Parkbandit]

Step it up bitch.

[Ashliana]

Make a thread denouncing Ron Suskind, formerly of the Wall Street Journal (before NEWSCORP bought them out), winner of the pulitzer prize in '95, who just wrote a book accusing the current administration of deliberately fabricating pre-war intelligence.

I'm sure it'll be entertaining. Not being a criticism of Obama, you guys haven't jumped at the opportunity yet. I'm still waiting..

[Back]

As for moi... I’m just sick of all the bickering. The republicans do this, the democrats do that, liberals, conservatives blah blah blah. When you can see through the bullshit it just gets boring.

I seriously would much rather discuss where we are going for dinner and drinks later.

[Some Rogue]

I seriously would much rather discuss where we are going for dinner and drinks later.

I'm sure the escort you hire won't care either way, she's getting paid regardless.

[Back]

I'm sure the escort you hire won't care either way, she's getting paid regardless.

Jeebus, who are you and when did I piss you off? :rofl:

I think you are confusing me with Elliot Spitzer.

[Some Rogue]

I think you are confusing me with Parkbandit.

Fixed.

[Warriorbird]

Law school.

[Latrinsorm]

Why so... serious?

[Khariz]

http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/joker-2.jpg

[Parkbandit]

Make a thread denouncing Ron Suskind, formerly of the Wall Street Journal (before NEWSCORP bought them out), winner of the pulitzer prize in '95, who just wrote a book accusing the current administration of deliberately fabricating pre-war intelligence.

I'm sure it'll be entertaining. Not being a criticism of Obama, you guys haven't jumped at the opportunity yet. I'm still waiting..

WAIT! Someone is out hawking a book showing the current administration in a bad light? WTF!

I think the entertaining part of it is your sudden switch to believing whatever he prints in his book.. but when he was a part of that evil conservative empire, you wouldn't give him the time of day.

THAT is entertaining.

[Ashliana]

WAIT! Someone is out hawking a book showing the current administration in a bad light? WTF!

I think the entertaining part of it is your sudden switch to believing whatever he prints in his book.. but when he was a part of that evil conservative empire, you wouldn't give him the time of day.

THAT is entertaining.

All I said was a suggestion to make the thread, not my stance on the issue. I didn't say whether or not I believed his sources or whether the CIA fabricated evidence. You really need to stop making these groundless jumps. You're capable of better; I've seen it.

[Trouble]

All I said was a suggestion to make the thread, not my stance on the issue. I didn't say whether or not I believed his sources or whether the CIA fabricated evidence. You really need to stop making these groundless jumps. You're capable of better; I've seen it.

Except you did use the word denouncing in your suggestion, which implies your stance.

:medieval:

[Methais]

Politics is gay. Voting is gay. Anyone who gets elected is gay.





























































You're gay.

[Ashliana]

Except you did use the word denouncing in your suggestion, which implies your stance.

:medieval:

Not necessarily. It implies that my stance is I believe anything that is even remotely critical of the current administration or McCain will be ignored, and anything even remotely critical of Obama will get a thread devoted to it.

[Parkbandit]

There's that communication difficulty you obviously have, rearing up it's ugly head once again.

And the pattern of you suddenly believing people once they come out against the current administration is well documented ala McClellan... so my so called "groundless jump" was anything but.

[Ashliana]

There's that communication difficulty you obviously have, rearing up it's ugly head once again.

And the pattern of you suddenly believing people once they come out against the current administration is well documented ala McClellan... so my so called "groundless jump" was anything but.

More like, there's people taking more from my words than I've actually said, again.

In any case, your objection to considering Scott McClellan's experiences with the administration you brought is up is also groundless. As press secretary, literally a mouthpiece of the administration, he repeated the policies and opinions of the hugely unpopular administration.

His book is about his personal experiences--not something he was provided with to say. Again, you're better than this, PB. Please put at least a modicum of effort in.

[Parkbandit]

Not necessarily. It implies that my stance is I believe anything that is even remotely critical of the current administration or McCain will be ignored, and anything even remotely critical of Obama will get a thread devoted to it.

You do have the ability of initiating threads. Perhaps you just lack the initiative? Is this a common trait of the typical liberal or something?

[Parkbandit]

More like, there's people taking more from my words than I've actually said, again.

In any case, your objection to considering Scott McClellan's experiences with the administration you brought is up is also groundless. As press secretary, literally a mouthpiece of the administration, he repeated the policies and opinions of the hugely unpopular administration.

His book is about his personal experiences--not something he was provided with to say. Again, you're better than this, PB. Please put at least a modicum of effort in.


And thank you for proving my point. Why put forth the effort, when I realize you will just come by in moments and validate my 'groundless jump'.

I think we're soulmates.

<3

[Methais]

http://www.my-two-cents.net/forenpix/thread-is-gay.jpg

[Ashliana]

And thank you for proving my point. Why put forth the effort, when I realize you will just come by in moments and validate my 'groundless jump'.

I think we're soulmates.

<3

I'll give you one thing--you're a master of posting words, but no content. It looks like you actually responded, when you didn't.

The implication that it is impossible to even consider what someone says if you didn't always agree with them is preposterous.

[Parkbandit]

I'll give you one thing--you're a master of posting words, but no content. It looks like you actually responded, when you didn't.

The implication that it is impossible to even consider what someone says if you didn't always agree with them is preposterous.

But isn't the implication of you not believing someone UNLESS they share your viewpoint just as preposterous?

McClellan was nothing but a puppet of the evil Bush administration and once he got out from beneath their evil clutches, THEN he was able to FINALLY speak the truth!

[Ashliana]

But isn't the implication of you not believing someone UNLESS they share your viewpoint just as preposterous?

McClellan was nothing but a puppet of the evil Bush administration and once he got out from beneath their evil clutches, THEN he was able to FINALLY speak the truth!

You are once again making the same fallacious argument that you can't consider someone's assertions if you ever disagreed with them in any capacity.

McClellan's job as Press Secretary was not to give out his own opinions or stances as they related to Bush policy. They were to state the Bush Administration's policies to the world.

I listened to McClellan, and the administration's rhetoric, whether or not I believed it. You're now saying that I can't consider McClellan's personal experiences as Press Secretary without having agreed to their rhetoric?

Bullshit. You're capable of a better argument than this, PB. This is really disappointing.

The fact that McClellan was a Bush insider makes his statements credible, not the other way around. This is pure "damage control" on your side. Nothing more.

[Daniel]

Bored.

[Warriorbird]

That too.