PDA

View Full Version : Question about warrior weapon assessing



Mr. Dallas
02-20-2008, 03:07 PM
How many ranks do you need to assess weapons and get the detail? At 54 ranks I can see the general weighting for example - but not how much.

Thanks!

D.

Celephais
02-20-2008, 03:16 PM
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?t=24635

Alright, here's the scoop.

First, a warrior doesn't need any ranks to detect if there's weighting at all: however, he or she will only have a 1/20th chance of doing so. This chance increases by 1/20th at 9 ranks and every 5.5 ranks thereafter (9, 14, 20, etc.). Thus, a level 40 warrior doubled in weapon (82 ranks) will have a 75% chance of detecting the presence of weighting. Statistics tells us that there's only a 1.6% chance of him or her missing weighting after three attempts. (I only had 96 ranks available to me, so I'm not sure if the progression goes all the way to 100%. I expect not.)

Second, a warrior will never misidentify a damage weighted weapon as a crit weighted weapon (and I suspect vice versa). Further, a warrior will never get a wrong value reading (misidentifying a somewhat weighted weapon as a decent weighted weapon, for instance).

AestheticDeath
02-20-2008, 03:16 PM
You can see how much, you just have to do it repeatedly, cause assessing sucks balls. Just like warriors.

Think of 405 and how fucking useless it is for your first 30 trains after getting it.

Mr. Dallas
02-20-2008, 03:26 PM
You can see how much, you just have to do it repeatedly, cause assessing sucks balls. Just like warriors.

Think of 405 and how fucking useless it is for your first 30 trains after getting it.

Thanks to you both!

D.

fallenSaint
02-20-2008, 05:36 PM
This thread had a few other tidbits in case you care:

http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?t=24635

Celephais
02-20-2008, 05:48 PM
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?t=24635


http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthread.php?t=24635
:whistle:

fallenSaint
02-20-2008, 06:31 PM
Didnt even pay attention to your link figured you pulled it from krakalacks site.