PDA

View Full Version : Iran boats 'threatened US ships'



Nieninque
01-07-2008, 12:56 PM
Surprised this isnt up yet.
from the BBC


Iran boats 'threatened US ships'
USS Port Royal (file image dated 18 December 2007)
The Pentagon insists the three vessels were in international waters
Five Iranian speedboats harassed three US navy ships at the weekend, approaching them and radioing a threat to blow them up, US officials say.

The incident happened in the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil shipping route. The US said their ships were about to open fire when the Iranian boats withdrew.

The White House has warned Iran against "provocative actions that could lead to a dangerous incident".

Iran played down the event, describing it as an "ordinary occurrence".

"The issue is resolved after both sides recognise each other," Iranian state media quoted a foreign ministry spokesman as saying.

'Serious provocation'

The speedboats, believed to belong to Iran's Revolutionary Guards, came within about 200m of the US vessels, Pentagon officials said.

"I am coming at you. You will explode in a couple of minutes," the Iranians said in a radio transmission, according to US officials.

Map showing Strait of Hormuz, with satellite photo
The Iranian boats were operating at "distances and speeds that showed reckless, dangerous and potentially hostile intent," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman.

He said at least some of the boats were visibly armed.

US sailors assumed battle stations and the captain on one of the ships was about to order an attack when the Iranian boats turned away, dropping unidentified objects in the path of the vessel, US officials said.

The confrontation, which occurred at about 0400 local time on Sunday or late on Saturday in Washington, lasted about 20 minutes, according to the US.

The Pentagon has insisted that the three US vessels - identified as navy cruiser USS Port Royal, destroyer USS Hopper and frigate USS Ingraham - were in international waters.

The incident follows a row that erupted last March when Iranian Revolutionary Guards captured 15 British sailors and held them for nearly two weeks.

Iran said the crew had strayed into Iranian waters, a claim which Britain disputed.

The Revolutionary Guards, set up in 1979 to defend the country's Islamic system, has been designated by the US as a "proliferator of weapons of mass destruction".

Ready to respond

The latest confrontation comes as US President George Bush is to begin a tour of the Middle East on Wednesday.

Long-standing US-Iranian tensions remain over Iran's nuclear programme, although these have been somewhat reduced since the US intelligence community released a report in late 2007 that said Iran had stopped its nuclear weapons programme in 2003.

The BBC's Paul Reynolds says the key question is whether this is a one-off incident or whether it heralds a more aggressive stance by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

The latter policy would be unexpected, given the lowering of tension over the nuclear issue, he says, but as the incident of the captured British naval personnel showed, tensions are always high.

There is no doubt that the US is ready to respond, our correspondent adds.

Gan
01-07-2008, 01:15 PM
Heh, saw that earlier while working on Huckabee.

That reminds me of tiny chiuaua's running up to a Great Dane and trying to appear threatening.

I would have used the boxes in the water as a chance for target practice. Since using the boats would have been frowned upon.

Tsa`ah
01-07-2008, 01:29 PM
Heh, saw that earlier while working on Huckabee.

That reminds me of tiny chiuaua's running up to a Great Dane and trying to appear threatening.

I would have used the boxes in the water as a chance for target practice. Since using the boats would have been frowned upon.

I'm sorry, but they gave every reason to be fired upon. Why aren't they chum right now?

Methais
01-07-2008, 01:31 PM
That reminds me of tiny chiuaua's running up to a Great Dane and trying to appear threatening.

http://www.obeythepurebreed.com/images/chihuahua_humping.jpg

Parkbandit
01-07-2008, 01:34 PM
I'm sorry, but they gave every reason to be fired upon. Why aren't they chum right now?

I agree. Enough politicall correctness for once.. fucking come up to a US warship and threaten to blow it up? Are you fucking kidding me?

One shot... boom. Take that threat seriously.. remember the USS Cole and take no chances.

Kaboom.

Gan
01-07-2008, 01:35 PM
I'm sorry, but they gave every reason to be fired upon. Why aren't they chum right now?

I think thats because that's the reponse that the Iranian government wanted from us.

We know we could have blown them out of the water, thats stating the obvious; so what was the real motive behind their act of lunacy in running small speed boats threateningly towards a US Cruiser, Destroyer, and a supporting frigate. Oh wait, we're talking about a culture that has no problem sending out suicide bombers for the 'cause'.

We should have made the decision to open fire sooner. Now precedence will demonstrate that its ok to run up on our ships in international waters - maybe next time with live explosives.

Tsa`ah
01-07-2008, 01:50 PM
Shoot first should have been the philosophy when you consider what happened to the USS Cole.

Khariz
01-07-2008, 01:53 PM
Ahh damn. I was hoping the iranian boats would be toast too.

:nono:

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 03:15 PM
They were dumping mysterious paraphernalia into the Ocean. Sounds like some serious Eco-terrorism to me. Good thing The Navy is up to par with the avant-garde Green standards craze. It would be.

Halstein
01-07-2008, 03:38 PM
The fire order had been given just as the boats had turned around

Atlanteax
01-07-2008, 03:41 PM
Hmmm... there are other indications that the incident is being "played up" whereas the US ships did not fire on the boats as were not yet in actual danger (as per the rules of engagement).

After Iran finally got a bit of fuel from Russia for the Buscher plant, back-channel negotiations over Iraq had bogged down, as apparently the Bush Adminstration has refused to budge on certain Iranian demands (probably how much Shitte control of the Iraqi government, as Iran wants and Iraq proxy versus the US desire of an Iraq that blocks Iran ... compromise would be neutral Iraq that is receptive to Iran).

I think the playing up of this incident was the Bush Adminstration's way of hinting to the Iranians that "hey, we can make up excuses for military action too". (note that the White House Spokeperson is now playing it down, as the "message" has already been delivered).

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 03:44 PM
I think the playing up of this incident was the Bush Adminstration's way of hinting to the Iranians that "hey, we can make up excuses for military action too".

Did you just actually manage to type that out without asphyxiating yourself with a bad tie?

Methais
01-07-2008, 03:45 PM
I wanna know what they dumped in the water when they rolled out.

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 03:46 PM
I wanna know what they dumped in the water when they rolled out.

Plastic rings from empty six-packs that hadn't been properly scissored to save the lobsters, dur.

Celephais
01-07-2008, 03:50 PM
I think the playing up of this incident was the Bush Adminstration's way of hinting to the Iranians that "hey, we can make up excuses for military action too".Did you just actually manage to type that out without asphyxiating yourself with a bad tie?
Boats of Mass Deestroction!! Invade! I don't think they need to "Hint" about that ability.


Plastic rings from empty six-packs that hadn't been properly scissored to save the lobsters, dur.
heh... http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/gengreen2/myhomepage/graphics/bird.jpg

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 03:52 PM
Yeah, hi. Lobster dinner is a little bit more important than "leg of well-oiled seagull" kthnx.

Asha
01-07-2008, 03:58 PM
Floyd says seaguls taste almost exactly like fish. Gamey fish.

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 04:02 PM
Yeah. I guess I could go for some deep fried seabird wings as a side with my whole roast Bald Eagle.

Maybe some manatee jerky thrown in.

Mmmm, manatee...

Celephais
01-07-2008, 04:07 PM
I really really hope one day we can bring back extinct animals using cloning so that we can eat them, imagine how many delicious species we haven't gotten to eat yet.

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 04:09 PM
I really really hope one day we can bring back extinct animals using cloning so that we can eat them, imagine how many delicious species we haven't gotten to eat yet.

... :lol:

"I ate a Double Whopper."

"I HAD DEINONYCHUS SCRAMBLED EGGS FOR BREAKFAST, PUSSY."

Asha
01-07-2008, 04:11 PM
''MMMmm you taste so good you last little fuck, you''...

Stanley Burrell
01-07-2008, 04:12 PM
5 stars