post your paste

[Jayvn]

Without looking just new post and Ctrl V, I'm wondering how much textual intercourse ends up on this.. snatched the idea off another forum today
however mine is kinda boring...

a thick silver potion (x16)

[Nieninque]

http://www.ADIFFERENTFORUM.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?tid=804&pid=1857#pid1857

[Kranar]

nameInput->SetSizeHints(180, nameInput->GetSize().GetHeight());

[War Angel]

.906 spirit

[Sean]

EXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVED. INSTALL NEW THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINUM FRAME WINDOW W/ 1" INSULATING GLASS @ EXISTING WINDOW LOCATION. VERIFY EXIST. SIZE IN FIELD. HEAD HEIGHT TO MATCH EXISTING. (TYPICAL @ EAST ELEVATION)

[The Ponzzz]

Please do not just offer your opinions. Back up your views with data from the text, VIDEO and actual ads you can use to reinforce your points.

[Danical]

*Source* | *Time*
----- | -----
Base | 120s
01-25 | 100s [4/level]
26-50 | 75s [3/level]
51-75 | 50s [2/level]
76-100 | 25s [1/level]
LOGic | 30s [1/bonus]
INFluence | 105s [3/bonus]
ML:T | 202s [2/rank]
----- | -----
Total | 707s [11:47]

[diethx]

rurouni kenshin

[Katt]

a polished gold serpent brooch


LOL this is fun. ;) I don't even remember copying that.

[Davenshire]

move s
move sw
move se
move go bridge
move s
move sw
move s
move sw
move e
move s
move ne
move ne
move e
move ne
move e
move s
move e
move ne
move e
move go path
move s
move s
move climb stair
move e
move se
move go door
move nw
move u
move ne
move u
move climb step
move climb staircase
move e
move u
move nw
move e
move e
exit

[Loten]

Solid Waste Management Department

[Snapp]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=316BF17k5d8

[Drew2]

http://autotask.ilinc.com/register/zbxpff

Haha. Training video for the client access part of our ticket system. I don't remember when I copied that.

[Drew]

baphomet

[Stanley Burrell]

The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 1 characters.

[Sean of the Thread]

San Francisco 49ers +9.5 (10 Units)

The San Francisco 49ers were supposed to have a much better and much more competitive team than last year coming into this season and I'm not too sure what happened along the way but they are about the exact same team as they were last season and they are a pathetic 2-6 on the year much like they were last season. However, it's worth noting that after starting last season with that 2-6 record, the Niners reeled off three straight wins against the Vikings, Lions and Seahawks. It's also hard to believe that this San Francisco team started the season 2-0 and that they managed to beat both Arizona and St. Louis in the first two weeks of the season. If you're wondering how bad this team actually is...and they are that bad...look no further than the fact that they have been outyarded by their opponents in every single one of their games this season and four of those games have been by more than 100 yards. However, they have been somewhat competitive in two of their last four games as they lost 9-7 at home to Baltimore and are coming off a 20-16 road loss against the Atlanta Falcons. So what has me betting on these chumps from San Fran? It's hard to tell but I think they can keep this game closer than people think. The Niners come into this game averaging only 13.0 points per game this season and putting points on the board has been their biggest issue. They average only 224.3 total yards of offense per game and only 4.2 yards per play this season which has them dead last in almost all offensive categories in the NFL. Having said that, Seattle's defense is and always has been beatble as they are allowing 17.6 points per game this season on 333.6 total yards of offense and 5.3 yards per play in those games. On the ground, the Niners get RB Frank Gore back for this game which is huge after he missed last week. He has led this running attack to 91.5 rushing yards per game but that has come on 4.2 yards per carry and we can expect a heavy dose of Gore tonight. The Seahawks have allowed 102.0 rushing yards per game on 3.8 yards per carry this season so there is room for Gore to do some damage. In the air, QB Alex Smith has been anything but impressive as he has completed only 49.7% of his passes this season for 800 yards, 4.8 yards per pass attempt, 2 touchdowns and 4 interceptions. However, things could open up for Smith tonight because a) he was 14 for 25 in Seattle last season for 162 yards and 2 touchdown passes and b) because this is virtually the same Seattle defense as last season and they have allowed opposing QB's to complete 60.1% of their passes this season for 6.4 yards per pass attempt. The biggest problem for the Niners has been the offensive line as they have allowed 28 sacks in eight games this season and you can bet your bottom dollar the Seahawks are going to come after him as they have 23 sacks in eight games this season. I do like that the Niners have allowed only four sacks the last two games but they'll have to come up with different schemes tonight to protect Smith. San Francisco has been horrendous on third downs this season, converting only 29.7% of them on the season but get to face a Seattle team that has allowed 42.5% of third downs against them to be converted. If the Niners can actually move the chains in this game and get Frank Gore going on the ground, I think Smith can have one of his better games this season. I also like the fact that once the Niners reach the Red Zone, which they rarely do, they have scored touchdowns 46.7% of the time this seaosn which is better than a lot of teams in the NFL. Even if this turns into a field goal fest, I like the Niners to have a much better game than they did the first time out against Seattle and I like Alex Smith to have one of his best outings of the year.

The Seattle Seahawks have quietly found a way to go 4-4 this season but they have lost three of their last four games and have really struggled to get things together in recent weeks. Making it worst tonight is the fact that both SEAN ALEXANDER AND DEION BRANCH are out. The Seahawks opened the season with big wins over Tampa Bay, Cincinnati and these San Francisco 49ers (with their only loss coming to Arizona) but since their win against these Niners, the Seahawks have won only one game and that was against St. Louis two weeks ago. So I guess you could say that the Niners and Seahawks have something in common as in they both played against Arizona and St. Louis this season. Well the Niners won both those games while the Seahawks split them. The impact of losing Alexander and Branch is big because Alexander, although not what he used to be, is the leading rusher on this team and Branch is the second best receiver on this team but definitely this team's top threat to go deep on any given down. Seattle has been good at home this season going 3-1 straight up and 2-2 ATS. They have been favored in all those home games but this is by far by the larges amount. The Seahawks come into this game averaging 20.9 points per game on the season and they have done that by also averaging 338.1 total yards of offense and 5.4 yards per play in those games. The Niners defense has actually done a very good job considering how ineffective and useless their offense is as they have allowed 23.3 points per game on the season and allowed a very respectable 336.5 total yards of offense and 5.2 yards per play on the season. On the ground, the Seahawks were averaging only 95.1 rushing yards per game this season on only 3.6 yards per carry and you can imagine how much that is probably going to slow down not that Sean Alexander is not playing. The Niners run defense has been solid all season allowing 127.3 rushing yards per game on only 3.9 yards per carry and the lack of a running threat for Seattle is going to allow the Niners to do more on defense. In the air, QB Matt Hasselbeck has completed 61.8% of his passes this season for 2023 passing yards, 7.2 yards per pass attempt, 13 touchdown passes and 7 interceptions. He is going up against a Niners defense that has allowed opposing QB's to complete 63.8% of their passes this season for 6.4 yards per pass attempt. The Seahawks offensive line is not that good, much like the Niners, and I think San Francisco can get some pressure on Hasselbeck tonight as they have 13 sacks in eight games this season. The biggest concern for me with this Niners defense is that they just don't force enough turnovers to be efficent and give their offense a shot. They have recovered only 5 fumbles all season and intercepted only 5 passes in eight games this season. However there is hope because Seattle is just as bad as the Niners when it comes to converting third downs this season as they have converted only 34.6% of their chances and have to go up against a Niners defense that has allowed opponents to convert only 42.0% of the time this season. The Seahawks Red Zone offense is worse than the Niners Red Zone offense as they have scored touchdowns only 43.5% of the time once in the Red Zone this season (which is not bad, but not better than the Niners). Seattle has had a lot of success on punt returns this season giving them great field position on several occasions but the Niners punt special teams are outstanding and they have held opponents to only 5.5 yards per punt return this season which could come in handy. I have bet on Seattle many times in the past and not once have I ever had a clean win. Everything they do is sloppy and tonight should be no different. The Niners defense is not as bad as people think, they only look bad because of the offense.

Ummmm not quite. Been there, done that with the Seahawks and never doing it again. I remember I was on them as -10 last year when they hosted the Niners and they ended up losing that game 24-14. So with no Sean Alexander (gametime decision) and no Deion Branch and the same core of guys still playing for the Seahawks, do you really think I am going to drop a single penny on those guys? Cmon now. I know a lot of you are going to look at the first meeting between these teams this season and see that Seattle had an easy time beating these guys 23-3 on their home turf. However, Alex Smith was not the starting QB in that game it was Trent Dilfer and despite not playing well this season, Smith already has a few wins over the Seahawks last season so his confidence should be okay. You also have to consider that Deion Branch, who is out tonight, was responsible for 7 receptions and 130 receiving yards with his longest catch being a 56 yarder. Also out tonight is Sean Alexander who ran for 78 yards in that game so right away you are taking away the core of the Seahawks offense tonight. The UNDER is probably the best way to go but other than that, the Niners should have no problems keeping up in this game as Seattle will continue to struggle on offense and the Niners will be motivated knowing this is a team they have already beat twice in the last year and a half. The whole coach Nolan thing is going to be an inspiration to these guys and I think they can come in here and pulloff the win. When you have two useless teams going up against each other at this time of the year, the underdog is the one and only way to go. Simple handicapping rule of football.

[Insodus]

>tackle mast
You hurl yourself at an ancient ghoul master and connect!
MS: +101 - MD: +101 + MAvA: +35 + d100: +89 == +124
Success!
You knock an ancient ghoul master flat and jump to your feet. Smooth!

[You have 4 repetition(s) remaining.]

Roundtime: 7 sec.

[Izalude]

An emperor penguin says, "Belnia, I wanted you to be my Empress from the day we met."
>
An emperor penguin says, "You've always and will forever be in my heart."
>
An emperor penguin asks, "Will you marry me?"
>
The emperor penguin drops a jewelled engagement ring.
>
Belnia utters a light chant and raises her hands, beckoning the lesser spirits to her aid...
>
Belnia gestures at a jewelled engagement ring.
You notice a small cloud form over a jewelled engagement ring.
>
You hear the rumbling of thunder as the cloud turns an ominous dark hue!
>
An emperor penguin says, "If I'm to die, let me die with your name upon my lips..."
>
The emperor penguin picks up a jewelled engagement ring with its beak.
>
Suddenly a lightning bolt explodes from the small thundercloud and strikes a jewelled engagement ring with a brilliant flash with some of the bolt hitting an emperor penguin!
... 45 points of damage!
The engagement ring is vaporized!

[Kyra231]

Rvain towers high above you and peers down inside the bottle. After a moment, Rvain suddenly appears next to you, miniaturized.

[Gan]

The impact of the blow picks you up and hurls you west!

[Makkah]

A meta-analysis in The New England Journal of Medicine published in May provides a large review of primary literature documenting cardiovascular incidents with RSG.

[Doughboy]

http://www.horrordvds.com/reviews/misc/pictures/RHETT.jpg

noticed this thread after being on OOC...and that was leftover after talking to Rhett.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

.loresing "fireleaf rod"

[Bobmuhthol]

Cowboys at Giants
Colts at Chargers
Vikings at Packers
Browns at Steelers
Jaguars at Titans
Broncos at Chiefs
Eagles at Redskins
Falcons at Panthers
Bengals at Ravens
Bears at Raiders
Lions at Cardinals
Bills at Dolphins
Rams at Saints

MONDAY

49ers at Seahawks

[Skeeter]

Lions knocked me out today. I wish they would make up their mind whether or not they're any good.

[B4Hand]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvUmYNNPbF4

[Jenisi]

Well I looked at yahoo music for "who's next" for upcoing artists. Possible cheap artists that I think would be great for our school would be:

Kt Tunstall (she sang that song that became a hit here and in the UK, black horse and a cherry tree) can hear her on www.myspace.com/kttunstall

[Methais]

www.goatse.cx

[Hips]

You ask, "Are you quite all right?"
>'you've been acting a little subdued tonight
You say, "You've been acting a little subdued tonight."
>
Jaysehn says, "Hmm....oh. Yes."
>
Jaysehn says, "I had something of a..."
>
Jaysehn ponders.
>
Jaysehn asks, "Trying evening?"
>
Jaysehn nods.
>nod jays
You nod to Jaysehn.
>
Jaysehn says, "Yes. Trying."
>'too much exertion while hunting or something of the sort?
You ask, "Too much exertion while hunting or something of the sort?"
>smile jays
You smile at Jaysehn.
>
Jaysehn nods.
>
Jaysehn smiles quietly to himself.
>nod
You nod.
>
Jaysehn says, "Yes, too much exertion."
>'I know all about that
You say, "I know all about that."
>roll eye
You roll your eyes.




The funny part is that he was LYING THROUGH HIS TEETH about why his night was "trying." Jolena can back me up on that. :P

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

Lady Adriata: You had told me you deleted them, jerk!
Lady Adriata: haha
IrishFloydian: What! No I didn't!
Lady Adriata: YEAH YOU DID
IrishFloydian: WHEN
Lady Adriata: When you were all angry with me
Lady Adriata: after we broke up
IrishFloydian: I didn't. Bahahah
Lady Adriata: I'm surprised you didn't send them to people on the PC forums in anger.
Lady Adriata: Not that I'd be ashamed.
Lady Adriata: I'd be like LOL LOOK I AM SO HOT

[Asha]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5996/worldofwarcraftgoldpictmg5.jpg

[TheEschaton]

http://www.nylawfund.org/pubs/durpoa.pdf

[Drew2]

Holy jesus fuck 412k gold. Someone tell me how to hack WoW accounts quick.

[Sean of the Thread]

yeah wtf is that about.

[CrystalTears]

^USR(863,"DICKENSJ")="123456^7^JACKIE^110111101001010110011100111111^0^5 265863258^1^D^^^0^61056^^^^^1^0^1"

[Sean]

now we have all the info we need on this jackie dickens!

[Methais]

http://www.adiscountbeauty.com/media/boudreauxs_butt_paste.jpg

[Revalos]

1Z1836810386849730

--------------------

Now you all can see when my shipment arrives!

Fun thread.

[Bobmuhthol]

(1 + 1 + .85 + 1.05 + 1.06 + 1.05) / 6 = 1.00166667

[Nieninque]

Next to be seen flicking through files,
The most committed and methodical Guardian for miles.
An illustrious history with much to commend it,
A reunion with C. Bellingham sadly to end it.
(Bromley Girls Grammar has much to commend it)
Jenny started her work at her Majesty’s pleasure.
A role which afforded her little leisure
Teaching prisoners the error of their ways,
Hoping they weren’t to end their days
(as she was) behind bars.

[Dwarven Empath]

American League 2007 Cy Young Voting

Player -- Total votes
C.C. Sabathia, Cle -- 119

Josh Beckett, Bos -- 86

John Lackey, LA -- 36

Fausto Carmona, Cle -- 7

Eric Bedard, Bal -- 1

Roy Halladay, Tor -- 1

Johan Santana, Min -- 1

Justin Verlander, Det

[Insodus]

yeah wtf is that about.

Probably a guild bank.

[Daniel]

Jason Johnson (Valencia) wrote
at 8:21pm
I wish and if I was u better had be bring some of those fine assssssssss women you be chillin with like shorty in yo pic.....LOL

[Gallows Thief]

>cast at summ circ
You gesture at a summoning circle.
A small shadowy rift begins to take form before your eyes. Suddenly, a dark cloud emerges from the rift, and begins crushing you!
... 40 points of damage!
Lucky shot rips through bone and muscle sending shield arm flying.
You are stunned for 8 rounds!

[thefarmer]

Hyphe [General]: "Anyone have any use for a Hickory Handled Steel Quarterstaff? Has raised AS. Ill give it away to the first person who wants it."
Icedraegon [Merchant]: "Nice weapons there."
Hyphe [General]: "Free item. I made a hickory handled steel quarterstaff. Raised base strength to 32 and base durability of 152. Free to whoever wants it."

[Methais]

http://forumspile.com/No-Darth_Vader.jpg

[Snapp]

SUNDAY

Giants at Lions
Patriots at Bills
Redskins at Cowboys
Panthers at Packers
Chiefs at Colts
Chargers at Jaguars
Bucs at Falcons
Steelers at Jets
Bears at Seahawks
Raiders at Vikings
Saints at Texans
Browns at Ravens
Cardinals at Bengals
Dolphins at Eagles
Rams at 49ers

MONDAY

Titans at Broncos

[Stanley Burrell]

Smslån

[Jorddyn]

1. ACDF_DOMAIN+ACDF_MODULE+ACDF_TYPE+ACDF_KEY1+ACDF_K EY2+ACDF_KEY3+ACDF_KEY4+ACDF_KEY5+ACDF_KEY6

[diethx]

I would also feel better if the shuttle dropped me off in front of my building (or at least closer to it).

[Izalude]

<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a64/lrenzo2/funny-picture-cat-fail.jpg" border="0"/></a>

[Some Rogue]

The Empath verb CURE has been updated. Previously, the caster would have to prepare the necessary healing spell, then would use this verb to specify which exact location to heal. Now, you can skip right to targeting the location and the verb will prepare the necessary spell automatically.

[Fallen]

As to swarming places, there are a few. The Temple Nelemar and especiall Old Ta'Faendryl have massive swarms. From what i've seen of Thanatoph's Bowels, that place swarms like crazy as well. There is pretty massive swarms in the higher hunting grounds on teras, out on the lava fields.

Mostly higher level places? Yes, but that is where the spell needs the most help.


----
Evarin and his Mis'ri

Scroll Infusion Collection Guide:
http://www.krakiipedia.org/wiki/Spell_Collection_Guide_%28scroll_infusion%29

Solutions for your Scroll Based Needs:
http://www.playershops.com/Merjinia - *RESTOCKED* 22 Oct 07

[ElanthianSiren]

Thomas Jefferson University
doesn't exist yet 2008
22k for full time in health professions
http://www.jefferson.edu/jchp/studentlife/JCHP%20Catalog%2005-07.pdf

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

a pair of traditional bright pink Faendryl shoes embroidered with images of rabid seagulls terrorizing the masses

[ElanthianSiren]

...that stings. that stings real bad.

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

http://www.ver2go.com/vendetta/news_images/111007.jpg

[Shari]

Lady Adriata (7:47:29 PM): You're not an attention whore
PetiteDollie (7:47:46 PM): Mmm...Jesae is.
Lady Adriata (7:47:40 PM): You play some characters that are
PetiteDollie (7:47:51 PM): Well, I try to make her be.
Lady Adriata (7:47:43 PM): but it suits her personality
Lady Adriata (7:47:45 PM): look at her gowns
Lady Adriata (7:47:47 PM): her attitude
PetiteDollie (7:47:58 PM): Heh
Lady Adriata (7:47:50 PM): Jesae is like
Lady Adriata (7:47:57 PM): I HAVE ARRIVED AND WILL BE HANDING OUT AUTOGRAPHS
PetiteDollie (7:48:13 PM): HAHAHAHA

[TheSmooth1]

/bump

being that is both omnipotent and omniscent. This means that it can both do anything and see everything. Obviously, since it can see everything, it can see into the future. If it can see into the future, it can choose its path, because it is omnipotent. This means it has seen the wrong future, or is unable to change the future, thus contradicting itself. Or, as said by an ancient Greek philosopher,

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? ~Epicurus

[Sean of the Thread]

http://www.well.com/user/mick/insomnia/

[Nilandia]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6aNV_xKSto

[Drew2]

LOL pasted my copy but it was porn so, maybe next time.

[Nieninque]

http://img107.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1june070062fp8.jpg

[Donquix]

powders, complaining, no complaining, liquid...whose keeping track really?

[Augie]

<center><a href="http://www.zwani.com/graphics/hello/"><img src="http://images.zwani.com/graphics/hello/images/11.gif" alt="ZWANI.com - The place for myspace comments, glitters, graphics, backgrounds and codes" border=0></a><br><a href="http://www.zwani.com/graphics/hello/" target="_blank">Myspace Hello Comments</a></center>

[Nieninque]

english,do good,interfearing no nothing idiots

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r26/Nikkifotos/wutz.png?t=1197142266

[Fallen]

http://www.krakiipedia.org/wiki/220


----
Scroll & Rest Location Guides:
http://www.krakiipedia.org/wiki/Spell_Collection_Guide_%28scroll_infusion%29
http://www.krakiipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popular_resting_locations

Solutions for Scroll-based Needs:
http://www.playershops.com/Merjinia

[Sean of the Thread]

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r26/Nikkifotos/wutz.png?t=1197142266

Most likely because that's what the cowardly women use for an excuse.

Just saying.

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

Most likely because that's what the cowardly women use for an excuse.

Just saying.

Riiiiiiiight.

In any case, the guy is an idiot. He not only thinks that women who get/have had an abortion should be executed, but that any woman who miscarries should be tried in a Court because that's manslaughter.

[Sean of the Thread]

Riiiiiiiight.

In any case, the guy is an idiot. He not only thinks that women who get/have had an abortion should be executed, but that any woman who miscarries should be tried in a Court because that's manslaughter.

Abortion checkout poll.
Please check the box that describes the reason for your abortion today.
(Your poll is anonymous. Only your conscience will judge you.)

A)I'm immature and irresponsible unable to even take care of myself.
B)I'm a slut and this was a result from a one night stand.
C thru V) Similar reasons.
W thru Y) Legit reasons.
Z) Oh my contraceptive failed.

[Fallen]

Isn't the risk of miscarriage quite high on the first pregnancy? Like...REALLY high?

[Sean of the Thread]

Isn't the risk of miscarriage quite high on the first pregnancy? Like...REALLY high?

The government wouldn't be supporting so many 13 year old mothers if that was the case. And if they had a miscarriage they wouldn't be getting an abortion now would they?

[Fallen]

My comments were in response to Narcissiia's claims that some idiot thinks that if a woman miscarries, it is somehow their fault and should be prosecuted.

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

Isn't the risk of miscarriage quite high on the first pregnancy? Like...REALLY high?

It's around 15-20 percent in the first trimester and only goes up as you age, with outside factors increasing that. A TON of women miscarry without even really even knowing they do because it's so early on in the pregnancy. The idea of trying women who miscarry on account of manslaughter is absurd, all emotional/scientific reasons aside, because of how ridiculously clogged up the system would be not just with as-they-come women who miscarry but any alive woman who miscarried in the past.

The guy is really a psycho.

[Sean of the Thread]

All women should have monthly blood tests taken by the government to determine if they're pregnant and that way they'll also know what's in their system if they miscarriage. And thus what can be attributed to their aiding in said miscarriage.

If any evidence is found they should be tried for AT LEAST man slaughter if not murder.

[Fallen]

Also, all citizens of the united states should be given a monthly urinalysis. All questionable results are subject to punitive action.

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

:rofl:

[Androidpk]

Also, all citizens of the united states should be given a monthly urinalysis. All questionable results are subject to punitive action.

That would be a pretty high percentage.

[LeDru]

.cast 904 target

[Asha]

Subject:

hey sweetie

Body:
I've seen your pix in ur profile and thought you were really cute. I'm new on myspace and dont really know what the hell I'm doing so i hope you get this msg. I'm on my cam right now. you know how exciting it is! come to chat with me?. you wanna Awesome
CLICK HERE
Awesome


Hope to see you there

Kiss

[Izalude]

I was cleaning up my log from the Ashrim quest during the Wavedancer...


A rallying cry echoes from the Ashrim defenders, "Ready your blades, men! We'll make those black-hearted scum wish they sunk to the bottom of the sea by the time we're through with them!"
>
Suddenly, everything freezes -- and your vision is tainted by a sickly scarlet hue as a deep crimson pillar of light flares upwards from somewhere nearby. Sounds filter in as if trapped behind a thick barrier of sludge, and in the back of your mind, you hear a slow, deliberate speech chanting words you do not understand.
>
And then reality washes over you once more, leaving you only with a faintly unwholesome feeling coursing through your veins.
>
A cry of, "A summoner! They have a summon--*GURK!*" is briefly heard.
>
A blurry wave of heat washes over you, and the surrounding plants begin to crumple inwards in apparent decay as a truly unholy presence washes over you and fades away just as quickly.
>
You hear a garbled cry of, "No, oh dear Patrons NOOOO---*GURK!*"
>
Suddenly, the light in the area is whisked away by something unseen, leaving you completely in darkness as your vision is once again tainted by sickly scarlet -- but then an earth-shattering roar shakes you back into reality, leaving your body feeling sapped of energy and deeply repulsed by some unseen force.
>
Far off to sea, ships burn and sink into the boiling ocean -- the fires raging across the horizons like candleflames in a vast tapestry of blackness dotted with crackles of untamed, raw essence.
>
A great, invisible hand closes around you, securing you in its grasp. As it draws you away from this place, time starts again...
>
The bloody battle wages on as you watch helplessly. Ashrim forces fight valiently but to no avail as they are overpowered by the attacking Faendryl. Elven corpses lie in battered and broken heaps upon the once lovely island shores as fires break out and sweep across the settlement.
>
The vision of the slaughter fades to black as you find yourself being yanked backwards in a lightless void.
>
For a small eternity, you are pulled through the darkness. As you blink, your surroundings change and you find yourself hovering mere feet above the deck of the WaveDancer.

[TheEschaton]

From Justice Blackmun’s opinion:
. . . Justice KENNEDY and the three Justices who join him would find the display of the crèche consistent with the Establishment Clause. He argues that this conclusion necessarily follows from the Court's decision in Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 103 S.Ct. 3330, 77 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983), which sustained the constitutionality of legislative prayer. Post, at 3139. He also asserts that the crèche, even in this setting, poses “no realistic risk” of “represent [ing] an effort to proselytize,” ibid., having repudiated the Court's endorsement inquiry in favor of a “proselytization” approach. The Court's analysis of the crèche, he contends, “reflects an unjustified hostility toward religion.” Post, at 3134. [see excerpt at pp. 5-8, infra]

Justice KENNEDY'S reasons for permitting the crèche on the Grand Staircase and his condemnation of the Court's reasons for deciding otherwise are so far reaching in their implications that they require a response in some depth.

**3106 A

In Marsh, the Court relied specifically on the fact that Congress authorized legislative prayer at the same time that it produced the Bill of Rights. See n. 46, supra. Justice KENNEDY, however, argues that Marsh legitimates all “practices with no greater potential for an establishment of religion” than those “accepted traditions dating back to the Founding.” Post, at 3141, 3142. Otherwise, the Justice asserts, such practices as our national motto (“In God We Trust”) and our Pledge of Allegiance (with the phrase “under God,” added in 1954, Pub.L. 396, 68 Stat. 249) are in danger of invalidity.

Our previous opinions have considered in dicta the motto and the pledge, characterizing them as consistent with the proposition that government may not communicate an endorsement*603 of religious belief. Lynch, 465 U.S., at 693, 104 S.Ct., at 1369 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring); id., at 716-717, 104 S.Ct., at 1382 (BRENNAN, J., dissenting). We need not return to the subject of “ceremonial deism,” see n. 46, supra, because there is an obvious distinction between crèche displays and references to God in the motto and the pledge. However history may affect the constitutionality of nonsectarian references to religion by the government,FN52 history cannot legitimate practices that demonstrate the government's allegiance to a particular sect or creed.
FN52. It is worth noting that just because Marsh sustained the validity of legislative prayer, it does not necessarily follow that practices like proclaiming a National Day of Prayer are constitutional. See post, at 3143. Legislative prayer does not urge citizens to engage in religious practices, and on that basis could well be distinguishable from an exhortation from government to the people that they engage in religious conduct. But, as this practice is not before us, we express no judgment about its constitutionality.
Indeed, in Marsh itself, the Court recognized that not even the “unique history” of legislative prayer, 463 U.S., at 791, 103 S.Ct., at 3336, can justify contemporary legislative prayers that have the effect of affiliating the government with any one specific faith or belief. Id., at 794-795, 103 S.Ct., at 3337-3338. The legislative prayers involved in Marsh did not violate this principle because the particular chaplain had “removed all references to Christ.” Id., at 793, n. 14, 103 S.Ct., at 3337, n. 14. Thus, Marsh plainly does not stand for the sweeping proposition Justice KENNEDY apparently would ascribe to it, namely, that all accepted practices 200 years old and their equivalents are constitutional today. Nor can Marsh, given its facts and its reasoning, compel the conclusion that the display of the crèche involved in this lawsuit is constitutional. Although Justice KENNEDY says that he “cannot comprehend” how the crèche display could be invalid after Marsh, post, at 3139, surely he is able to distinguish between a specifically Christian symbol, like a crèche, and more general religious references, like the legislative prayers in Marsh.

*604Justice KENNEDY's reading of Marsh would gut the core of the Establishment Clause, as this Court understands it. The history of this Nation, it is perhaps sad to say, contains numerous examples of official acts that endorsed Christianity specifically. See M. Borden, Jews, Turks, and Infidels (1984).FN53 Some of these **3107 examples date back to the Founding of the Republic,FN54 but this heritage of official discrimination *605 against non-Christians has no place in the jurisprudence of the Establishment Clause. Whatever else the Establishment Clause may mean (and we have held it to mean no official preference even for religion over nonreligion, see, e.g., Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1, 109 S.Ct. 890, 103 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989)), it certainly means at the very least that government may not demonstrate a preference for one particular sect or creed (including a preference for Christianity over other religions). “The clearest command of the Establishment Clause is that one religious denomination cannot be officially preferred over another.” Larson v. Valente, 456 U.S. 228, 244, 102 S.Ct. 1673, 1683, 72 L.Ed.2d 33 (1982). There have been breaches of this command throughout this Nation's history, but they cannot diminish in any way the force of the command. Cf. Laycock, supra, n. 39, at 923.FN55
FN53. Among the stories this scholar recounts is one that is especially apt in light of Justice KENNEDY's citation of Thanksgiving Proclamations, post, at 3142:

“When James H. Hammond, governor of South Carolina, announced a day of ‘Thanksgiving, Humiliation, and Prayer’ in 1844, he ... exhorted ‘our citizens of all denominations to assemble at their respective places of worship, to offer up their devotions to God their Creator, and his Son Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of the world.’ The Jews of Charleston protested, charging Hammond with ‘such obvious discrimination and preference in the tenor of your proclamation, as amounted to an utter exclusion of a portion of the people of South Carolina.’ Hammond responded that ‘I have always thought it a settled matter that I lived in a Christian land! And that I was the temporary chief magistrate of a Christian people. That in such a country and among such a people I should be, publicly, called to an account, reprimanded and required to make amends for acknowledging Jesus Christ as the Redeemer of the world, I would not have believed possible, if it had not come to pass' ( The Occident, January 1845).” Borden 142, n. 2 (emphasis in Borden).



Thus, not all Thanksgiving Proclamations fit the nonsectarian or deist mold as did those examples quoted by Justice KENNEDY. Moreover, the Jews of Charleston succinctly captured the precise evil caused by such sectarian proclamations as Governor Hammond's: they demonstrate an official preference for Christianity and a corresponding official discrimination against all non-Christians, amounting to an exclusion of a portion of the political community. It is against this very evil that the Establishment Clause, in part, is directed. Indeed, the Jews of Charleston could not better have formulated the essential concepts of the endorsement inquiry.
FN54. In 1776, for instance, Maryland adopted a “Declaration of Rights” that allowed its legislature to impose a tax “for the support of the Christian religion” and a requirement that all state officials declare “a belief in the Christian religion.” 1A. Stokes, Church and State in the United States 865-866 (1950). Efforts made in 1797 to remove these discriminations against non-Christians were unsuccessful. Id., at 867. See also id., at 513 (quoting the explicitly Christian proclamation of President John Adams, who urged all Americans to seek God's grace “through the Redeemer of the world” and “by His Holy Spirit”).
FN55. Justice KENNEDY evidently believes that contemporary references to exclusively Christian creeds (like the Trinity or the divinity of Jesus) in official acts or proclamations is justified by the religious sentiments of those responsible for the adoption of the First Amendment. See 2 J. Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 1874, p. 663 (1858) (at the time of the First Amendment's adoption, “the general, if not the universal sentiment in America was, that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the state”). This Court, however, squarely has rejected the proposition that the Establishment Clause is to be interpreted in light of any favoritism for Christianity that may have existed among the Founders of the Republic. Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S., at 52, 105 S.Ct., at 2487.

B

Although Justice KENNEDY's misreading of Marsh is predicated on a failure to recognize the bedrock Establishment Clause principle that, regardless of history, government may not demonstrate a preference for a particular faith, even he is forced to acknowledge that some instances of such favoritism are constitutionally intolerable. Post, at 3139, n. 3. He concedes also that the term “endorsement” long has been another way of defining a forbidden “preference” for *606 a particular sect, post, at 3140-3141, but he would repudiate the Court's endorsement inquiry as a “jurisprudence of minutiae,” post, at 3144, because it examines the particular contexts in which the government employs religious symbols.

This label, of course, could be tagged on many areas of constitutional adjudication. For example, in determining whether the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant and probable cause before the government may conduct a particular search or seizure, “we have not hesitated to balance the governmental and privacy interests to assess the practicality of the warrant and probable cause requirements in the particular context,” Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn., 489 U.S. 602, 619, 109 S.Ct. 1402, 1414, 103 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) (emphasis added), an inquiry that “ ‘depends on all of the circumstances surrounding the search or seizure and the nature of the search or seizure itself,’ ” ibid., quoting **3108 United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 537, 105 S.Ct. 3304, 3308, 87 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985); see also Treasury Employees v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656, 666, 109 S.Ct. 1384, 1390, 103 L.Ed.2d 685 (1989) (repeating the principle that the applicability of the warrant requirement turns on “the particular context” of the search at issue). It is perhaps unfortunate, but nonetheless inevitable, that the broad language of many clauses within the Bill of Rights must be translated into adjudicatory principles that realize their full meaning only after their application to a series of concrete cases.

Indeed, not even under Justice KENNEDY's preferred approach can the Establishment Clause be transformed into an exception to this rule. The Justice would substitute the term “proselytization” for “endorsement,” post, at 3136, 3137, 3139, but his “proselytization” test suffers from the same “defect,” if one must call it that, of requiring close factual analysis. Justice KENNEDY has no doubt, “for example, that the [Establishment] Clause forbids a city to permit the permanent erection of a large Latin cross on the roof of city hall ... because such an obtrusive year-round religious display*607 would place the government's weight behind an obvious effort to proselytize on behalf of a particular religion.” Post, at 3137. He also suggests that a city would demonstrate an unconstitutional preference for Christianity if it displayed a Christian symbol during every major Christian holiday but did not display the religious symbols of other faiths during other religious holidays. Post, at 3139, n. 3. But, for Justice KENNEDY, would it be enough of a preference for Christianity if that city each year displayed a crèche for 40 days during the Christmas season and a cross for 40 days during Lent (and never the symbols of other religions)? If so, then what if there were no cross but the 40-day crèche display contained a sign exhorting the city's citizens “to offer up their devotions to God their Creator, and his Son Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of the world”? See n. 53, supra.

The point of these rhetorical questions is obvious. In order to define precisely what government could and could not do under Justice KENNEDY's “proselytization” test, the Court would have to decide a series of cases with particular fact patterns that fall along the spectrum of government references to religion (from the permanent display of a cross atop city hall to a passing reference to divine Providence in an official address). If one wished to be “uncharitable” to Justice KENNEDY, see post, at 3144, one could say that his methodology requires counting the number of days during which the government displays Christian symbols and subtracting from this the number of days during which non-Christian symbols are displayed, divided by the number of different non-Christian religions represented in these displays, and then somehow factoring into this equation the prominence of the display's location and the degree to which each symbol possesses an inherently proselytizing quality. Justice KENNEDY, of course, could defend his position by pointing to the inevitably fact-specific nature of the question whether a particular governmental practice signals the government's *608 unconstitutional preference for a specific religious faith. But because Justice KENNEDY's formulation of this essential Establishment Clause inquiry is no less fact intensive than the “endorsement” formulation adopted by the Court, Justice KENNEDY should be wary of accusing the Court's formulation as “using little more than intuition and a tape measure,” post, at 3145, lest he find his own formulation convicted on an identical charge.

Indeed, perhaps the only real distinction between Justice KENNEDY's “proselytization” test and the Court's “endorsement” inquiry is a burden of “unmistakable” clarity that Justice KENNEDY apparently would require of government favoritism for specific sects in order to hold the favoritism in violation of the Establishment Clause. Post, at 3139, n. 3. The question whether a particular practice “would place the government's weight behind an obvious **3109 effort to proselytize for a particular religion,” post, at 3137, is much the same as whether the practice demonstrates the government's support, promotion, or “endorsement” of the particular creed of a particular sect-except to the extent that it requires an “obvious” allegiance between the government and the sect.FN56
FN56. In describing what would violate his “proselytization” test, Justice KENNEDY uses the adjectives “permanent,” “year-round,” and “continual,” post, at 3137, 3139, n. 3, as if to suggest that temporary acts of favoritism for a particular sect do not violate the Establishment Clause. Presumably, however, Justice KENNEDY does not really intend these adjectives to define the limits of his principle, since it is obvious that the government's efforts to proselytize may be of short duration, as Governor Hammond's Thanksgiving Proclamation illustrates. See n. 53, supra. In any event, the Court repudiated any notion that preferences for particular religious beliefs are permissible unless permanent when, in Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S., at 620, 108 S.Ct., at 2597, it ordered an inquiry into the “specific instances of impermissible behavior” that may have occurred in the administration of a statutory program.
Our cases, however, impose no such burden on demonstrating that the government has favored a particular sect or creed. On the contrary, we have expressly required “strict *609 scrutiny” of practices suggesting “a denominational preference,” Larson v. Valente, 456 U.S., at 246, 102 S.Ct., at 1684, in keeping with “ ‘the unwavering vigilance that the Constitution requires' ” against any violation of the Establishment Clause. Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 623, 108 S.Ct. 2562, 2566, 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988) (O'CONNOR, J., concurring), quoting id., at 648, 108 S.Ct., at 2594 (dissenting opinion); see also Lynch, 465 U.S., at 694, 104 S.Ct., at 1370 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring) (“[T]he myriad, subtle ways in which Establishment Clause values can be eroded” necessitates “careful judicial scrutiny” of “[g]overnment practices that purport to celebrate or acknowledge events with religious significance”). Thus, when all is said and done, Justice KENNEDY's effort to abandon the “endorsement” inquiry in favor of his “proselytization” test seems nothing more than an attempt to lower considerably the level of scrutiny in Establishment Clause cases. We choose, however, to adhere to the vigilance the Court has managed to maintain thus far, and to the endorsement inquiry that reflects our vigilance.FN57
FN57. It is not clear, moreover, why Justice KENNEDY thinks the display of the crèche in this lawsuit is permissible even under his lax “proselytization” test. Although early on in his opinion he finds “no realistic risk that the crèche ... represent[s] an effort to proselytize,” post, at 3139, at the end he concludes: “[T]he eager proselytizer may seek to use [public crèche displays] for his own ends. The urge to use them to teach or to taunt is always present.” Post, at 3146 (emphasis added). Whatever the cause of this inconsistency, it should be obvious to all that the crèche on the Grand Staircase communicates the message that Jesus is the Messiah and to be worshipped as such, an inherently prosyletizing message if ever there was one. In fact, the angel in the crèche display represents, according to Christian tradition, one of the original “proselytizers” of the Christian faith: the angel who appeared to the shepherds to tell them of the birth of Christ. Thus, it would seem that Justice KENNEDY should find this display unconstitutional according to a consistent application of his principle that government may not place its weight behind obvious efforts to proselytize Christian creeds specifically.

Contrary to Justice KENNEDY's assertion, the Court's decision in Lynch does not foreclose this conclusion. Lynch certainly is not “dispositive of [a] claim,” post, at 3139, regarding the government's display of a crèche bearing an explicitly proselytizing sign (like “Let's all rejoice in Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of the world,” cf. n. 53, supra ). As much as Justice KENNEDY tries, see post, at 3139, there is no hiding behind the fiction that Lynch decides the constitutionality of every possible government crèche display. Once stripped of this fiction, Justice KENNEDY's opinion transparently lacks a principled basis, consistent with our precedents, for asserting that the crèche display here must be held constitutional.

[TheEschaton]

If you couldn't tell, I have an exam tomorrow in Constitutional Law, and the Establishment Clause'll be on it. That exerpt is from Marsh.

[Hips]

The bakufu was a large bureaucracy. In theory, and sometimes in practice, the shōgun ruled as absolute dictator. The first three did rule with an iron hand, but after them the situation varied widely depending on circumstances. Some shōguns were weak-willed, incompetent, or simply lazy. Owing to the institutions established during the first fifty years of the bakufu, its governing machinery functioned reasonably well with or without strong shōgunal leadership.


Japanese civ final tomorrow. Kill me plz.

[Stunseed]

Happy b-day today, though!

[Sthrockmorton]

one final left for me on Thursday, then done with my undergrad degrees :)

[Hips]

Happy b-day today, though!

Thanks! :)

It never fails with this university... every year I have an exam the day AFTER my birthday so I can't celebrate properly. :(

[Nilandia]

Just finished my worst final today, so it'll only get easier from here. Yay!

And happy Birthday, Michi! :heart:

Gretchen

[Nieninque]

•

[Bobmuhthol]

Jamie at least made an attempt, but I cringed when I read "ln is the log of e." Natural logarithms are logarithms in base e.

log base 10 of 10 = 1, that is, 101 = 10 [log(10) = 1]
log base 10 of 100 = 2, that is, 102 = 100 [log(100) = 2]
log base e of 2.71828183 = 1, that is, e1 = 2.71828183 [ln(2.71828183) = 1]
log base e of 7.3890561 = 2, that is, e2 = 7.3890561 [ln(7.3890561) = 2]

The way to work with logarithmic functions in equations most readily is to understand the fundamental concept behind logarithms: exponents and logarithms are inverse functions. Much like you divide something that's been multiplied, you use logarithms for exponential expressions.

As far as the structure of a logarithmic equation: the base is the number being raised to the exponent, and I'll define two other numbers as a and b for simplicity. A general logarithmic equation will look like this: logbase(a) = b. This means that base^b = a. Given any 2 numbers (base, a, and b), you can solve for the third for any logarithm.

Example: log2(32) = x, solve for x.
This is where knowing that logarithms and exponents are inverse functions becomes useful. Just like you can take the logarithm of both sides of an equation, you can raise a number to an exponent defined as each side of the equation. Thus;
2log2(32) = 2x

[Fallen]

You silly jerk face, where have you been? Also, I like the ideas of those maneuvers transfering over to thrown.

[Methais]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz3_ZYYE9II

[TheEschaton]

skinner v. oklahoma

[Asha]

steven seagals greatest hits

[Methais]

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a162/DoyleHargraves/nopaste.jpg

I had nothing copied to paste :(

[Asha]

right seriously...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://photobucket.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/shimmisking/steven_seagal_450_01_450x300.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://photobucket.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/shimmisking/seagal_blog275x281.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://photobucket.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/shimmisking/seagal8.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

yes that's Seagal

[Asha]

I just liked how it looked..
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/shimmisking/pc.jpg

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

Lady Adriata: I read that as
Lady Adriata: K>
Jeazabelle scratches under her black leather longcoat, trying to reach that pussy on her back.
K>
KandyBeanz: Is that what you read?
Lady Adriata: No like
Lady Adriata: that was what I thought it said
Lady Adriata: WAIT WAIT
Lady Adriata: SHE HAS A PUSSY
Lady Adriata: ON HER BACK?
KandyBeanz: LMAO
KandyBeanz: LOLOL

[Augie]

Christina Perry
Assistant General Manager
La Quinta Inn - Baymeadows #818
8255 Dix Ellis Trail
Jacksonville, FL 32256-8209
Phone: 904-731-9940
Fax: 904-731-3854
http://818.lq.com/

[Ilvane]

Title:The Psychology of the Analyst in Two Cultures.Find More Like ThisAuthor(s):Smith, Henry F., henryfsmith@gmail.com Address:Smith, Henry F., 17 Hammond Street, Cambridge, MA, US, 02138, henryfsmith@gmail.com Source:Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Vol 76(3), Jul 2007. pp. 669-678.Publisher:US: Psychoanalytic Quarterly.ISSN:0033-2828 (Print)Language:EnglishKeywords:psychology; analysts; Freud; psychoanalytic theory; psychoanalysis; spiritAbstract:The two papers we are republishing in this issue as part of The Psychoanalytic Quarterly's continuing 75th anniversary year commemoration were seminal contributions to what some would say has become the subject matter of our time, the psychology of the analyst. Both men, Robert Fliess and Heinrich Racker, had interests beyond those evident in these papers. Although best known for his work on countertransference, Racker continued to explore what he called the psychoanalysis of the spirit, the title of one of his books in which he presented a wide-ranging psychoanalytic view of philosophy, religion, anthropology, music, literature, and film. Fliess, on the other hand, following this initial foray into the psychology of the analyst, turned his attention to the study of dreams, and thence to what he believed lay behind the amnesia in his patients. He concluded that the frequency of ambulatory psychosis was much higher among the parents of patients than was generally recognized, and their seduction and assault of their own children before the age of four far more common than Freud acknowledged after his abandonment of the seduction theory. Thus, Fliess returned to the very thesis Freud had first proposed to his father, Wilhelm, at a time when Robert was himself a year or two old. Even more curious, he left hints that he had similar suspicions about his own father. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved)Subjects:*Freud (Sigmund); *Psychoanalysis; *Psychoanalysts; *Psychoanalytic Theory; *Psychology; SeductionClassification:Psychoanalytic Therapy (3315)Population:Human (10)Publication Type:Journal, Peer Reviewed Journal; Print
Format(s) Available: PrintDocument Type:Journal ArticleRelease Date:20071001Accession Number:2007-12144-001Number of Citations in Source:27Persistent link to this record:http://ezp1.harvard.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-12144-001&site=ehost-live&scope=siteDatabase: PsycINFOView Links:

[Methais]

Now this is the story all about how
My mage got flip turned upside down

And I'd like to take a minute just sit right there
I'll tell you how i became the gimp of arena bracket pair

In west Tirisfal Glades dead and raised
In the battlegrounds was where I spent most of my days

Chilling and nuking and shattering Blastwave
And making some water outside of the cave

When a couple of devs who were up to no good
Started nerfing everything in my neighborhood

I asked for one little buff and they all got scared
They said we're giving you diminishing returns on your snares

I whistled for a zeppelin and when it came near
The license plate said CASH and it had bombs in the mirror

If anything I could say that this cab was rare
But I thought naw forget it yo Tseric this ain't fair

I pulled up to the forums about seven or eight
And I yelled to the goblin yo homes, time is money

Looked at my kingdom I was finally there
To cry on the forums but Blizzard don't care


………………………………………………….._,,-~~’’’’’’’’’’’’’~~--,,,_………………………………………..
…………………………………………….,,-~’’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘-,’’-,,_..………………………………..
…………………………………………,-‘’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ __’-,__’-,___…………………………..
………………………………………,-‘’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ _,,,--~~’’’’’’¯¯_,,,,----~~---,,¯’’’’~--,,,_……………….
……………………………………,-‘’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ _,,-~’’’¯¯’’~--,,-~’’¯¯¯ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ¯¯¯’’’~--,,¯’’~-,,………..
………………………………….,-‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ,,-~’’’__,,,,,,-~’’’ ; ;¯¯’’~-,, ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘¯’’~-,, ‘-,……..
…………………………………,’ ‘ ‘,,-~’’ ;’’~’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ¯’’~-,, ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘’-, ‘-,……
………………………………..,’,,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’-,, ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘\\ .\\….
…………………………..,-~’’¯¯’-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-, ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ | .|….
…………………………,’ ,-‘’ ; ; ; ‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’’’’’’~~-,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ,’ ,’….
…………………………| | ; ;,-~ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _,,,_ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘,’,-‘…..
…………………………’,’, ; ‘-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’--‘¯’’- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,, ; ; ,’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘,,-‘,-‘……..
,,,,__…………………,-‘ ‘-,_,- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ;’’--,,’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ,,-~’,-‘’………..
____ ¯’’’~--,--,,_,,-~’’,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; / ;,,,_ ; ; ;,’ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ _,,,-~’’,,-~’¯…………..
____¯’’’’--,-‘ : : : / , ,/ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-~~’’ ( ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’, ; ‘--‘ ‘-, ,’====’’--~~’’¯…………………
; ; ; ¯¯¯’’| : : : :| , ,,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-~ ; ; ; ; ;¯’’-, ; ; ; ; ‘-, ; ; ; ,-‘…………………………………
; ; ; ; ; ; | : : : :| , , | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,’ _,,,,,__ ; ; ; ; ‘~--~,,,-‘ ; ; ,-’…………...................................
_ ; ; ; ; ; | : : : :| , , | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,’ ; ‘,’~’,/./’’/~,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-‘…………....................................
:¯’’’’’’’’’’’’| : : : :| , , | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | ; ; ;’-, .¯’’’~’-,/’-, ; ;; ;,-‘’………10 water per cast would ruin the economy. L2P
--,,,___ : | : : : | , , | ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | ; ; ; ; ;’’-,,,_,,,/’’ ; / ;-‘’…………………………………………
; ; ; ; ; ;¯ | : : : | , , | ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘,-~’’…………………………………………….
-----,,,,,,,_’, : : :’, , ,’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’-,,_ ; ; ; ; ‘’-,,_ ; ; ; ,‘-‘’…………………………………………………
__ : : : : : :| : : :| , , ‘,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘’~-,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-‘’……………………………….,-~’’~-,………….
; ; ¯’’’’’’’’’’~’, : : :’, , , ,’-,,_ ; ; ; ; ; _,-‘,’’~-,,_ ;,-‘’………………………………__,’¯’’_’’’~-,’_............
____ ; ; ; ; ;’, : : :’, , , , , ,’’~~-,,-,’’ , , ,’~~---,, ‘’’ :|……………………………….. ‘-,__¯ ; ¯’’’~-,’’’-,,…….
: : : :¯¯¯¯¯¯ ‘-, : : :’-, , , , ,,-~’ : | , , ,-‘___ ; ; ‘’~-,|………………………………..,-‘__¯¯’’~,, ; ; ¯’-,’,…..
---------,,,,,,,,,,,_’-, : : :’’~-,,’’-,,,_,|,,-~’¯ : : :¯¯’’-, ; |……………………………..,,-‘’¯ ; ;’’-,, ; ;’-, ; ; ;|;|…..
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ¯ ‘’~-,,,_ : ¯’’’’~=’’ ;¯’’’’’’’’’’’’~,, : ‘’ |…………………………..,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’, ; ; ;’, ; ,’ |…..
~~~~~~------,,,,,,,__ ; ; ¯’’’’’’’¯,,,-,,,,,,,___ ; ; ‘-, : ‘,……………………….,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;/ ; ; ;/ ; | ; |…..
_____ : : : : : : : : : :¯’’’’’’’’’’’’¯¯ : : _____ : ‘’-, ; ‘-, ‘,……………………..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘ ; ;’ ; |……
; ; ; ; ¯¯¯¯¯’’’’’’’’’’’’’’~~~----~’’’¯¯¯ ; ; ; ; ‘’-, : ‘-, ; ; ‘,…………………..,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ) ; ;) ; ),,’…..
_________ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; __,,,----,,,,,,,_ ; ; ;’, : :¯’’-,,’,……………….,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;_,,,-~~’’¯……..
: : : : : : : : ¯’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’ : : : _,,,,,_ : : ’-, ;,-‘ : : : :,-‘’…………..,,-~’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _,,-~’’………………..
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,____ : : : : _,,-~’’’ ; ; ; ; ;’-,/ : :’-‘ : :,,-~’’………..,,-~’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-‘’………………………
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯¯¯¯¯___,,,,----,,, ; ;/ -, : : : :|………..,,-~’’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-‘’’………………………….
-----------,,,,,,,,------~~’’,,___,,,,,,,, ‘,-‘ ; ; ‘-,,,,_|…..,,-~’’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-~’’……………………………..
: : : : : : : : : : : : :_,,-‘ ; ; ; ;,,-~’’’/ ‘-~~’’¯,,-,,,-‘-‘’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-~’’…………………………………..
‘’’’’’’’’’’’’’~~~~~’’’’’,,-~-,,,,--~~,,--‘-~’’’-~’’-‘’’¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-‘’…………………………………………
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;_,,-~’’ __ : : :,,,,-‘’/=’’ :,,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-‘’…………………………………………….
~~~~~’’’’’’_,,-~’’’ ; ; ‘’’’’’ ; ,-‘’ : ,,-‘’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-‘’………………………………………………..
__,,,-~~’’’ ;,,-~---,,,,,,--‘’ / : : ,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-‘’…………………………………………………..
; ; ; ;_,,-~’’ __ : : : :,,--/ : :,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;

[Asha]

:lol: That is ace

[Methais]

I wrote that the other night in a drunken haze, somehow.

[Nieninque]

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh95/Auwyn/piersunset.jpg?t=1197416681

[Izalude]

The steady ring of hammer on faenor ends abruptly with a wrenchingly sour note and bits of red hot faenor fly in all directions! With a single, faulty blow of your hammer, you've totally shattered your faenor slab. You set the mithril tongs back on the anvil as you shake your head and stare in disbelief.

[Bobmuhthol]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=ln%28398%29

[Mighty Nikkisaurus]

You give Ondrea 200000 coins.
>
(OOC) You quietly whisper to Ondrea, "TAKE THAT WHORE."
>
(OOC) Ondrea's player whispers, "THANKS BITCH."
>

[Izalude]

Insanity leads to chaos, which inevitably leads one to solitude. The fruitless attempt to add meaning to that which is meaningless. A solitary crystal tear falls to the tranquil seas; The echo of the remaining star cries out across the infinite vaccuum. All I can do is send my distant prayers over the winds of time, setting sail on dreams...

[Nilandia]

A grey orc thrusts his snout out as if daring someone to slap it.

You swing a shadowy black falchion at a grey orc!
AS: +253 vs DS: +72 with AvD: +34 + d100 roll: +13 = +228
... and hit for 67 points of damage!
Wild upward slash removes the grey orc's face from his skull!
Interesting way to die.
A grey orc gazes upward one last time and dies.