Jayvn
09-18-2007, 12:16 PM
So I think i've got the formula down but I want some of you higher math people to double check an see if i'm just delusional or onto something
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ok, so i simplified the recipes into my own terminology to better assess them.. like AC, SC, TC, NC for each respective crystal type, then ACx faintly glimmering dust aka ayanad extract. anyone who's paying attention with the general potions has noticed the gradual climb of ingredients.. it's like some kind of math problem staring me in the face..well here's what I've got so far... these aren't the recipes, just what i figure the key components of them are.
minor mana well SC1 ACx2 glim ess dust
lesser mana well TC1 SCx2 glowing ess dust
Therefor I believe a greater mana well potion (which we don't have a recipe for yet to my knowledge) would be
greater mana well NC1 TCx2 radiant ess dust
finally a possible use for the N'ayanads???
btw each of the first involed 1 tkaro root, so i'd guess that wouldn't change..but you know how the GM's love to taunt us :)
~Jayvn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
minor mana regen 1 leaf 2 tkaro 1SC 1glim mote
lesser mana regen 2 leaf 2 tkaro 1TC 1glow mote 1 SCx
??greater mana rege 2 leaf 2 tkaro 1NC 1radian mote 1 TCx
this is a bigger guess than the last idea mainly due to they may add in the SCx in the greater as well..or possible 2 SCx rather than a TCx.. dunno though.. hell it may have more than 2 ayana leafs.. I'm really bored in networking class =/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
do the recipes constantly follow an algorithm of some sort.. I've got like 5 pieces of paper already covered with bad math =/
oh and if there's a better than greater mana potion I think it'll be something like one of these
SC + TC + ACx + radi shard
SC + TC + ACx + radi shard
i'm opting more for one of the two below
SC + TC + SCx + radi shard
2SC + TC + SCx + radi shard
I put the first two because the ACx didn't jump up to SCx in the third recipe, only the shard jumped up a step
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ok, so i simplified the recipes into my own terminology to better assess them.. like AC, SC, TC, NC for each respective crystal type, then ACx faintly glimmering dust aka ayanad extract. anyone who's paying attention with the general potions has noticed the gradual climb of ingredients.. it's like some kind of math problem staring me in the face..well here's what I've got so far... these aren't the recipes, just what i figure the key components of them are.
minor mana well SC1 ACx2 glim ess dust
lesser mana well TC1 SCx2 glowing ess dust
Therefor I believe a greater mana well potion (which we don't have a recipe for yet to my knowledge) would be
greater mana well NC1 TCx2 radiant ess dust
finally a possible use for the N'ayanads???
btw each of the first involed 1 tkaro root, so i'd guess that wouldn't change..but you know how the GM's love to taunt us :)
~Jayvn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
minor mana regen 1 leaf 2 tkaro 1SC 1glim mote
lesser mana regen 2 leaf 2 tkaro 1TC 1glow mote 1 SCx
??greater mana rege 2 leaf 2 tkaro 1NC 1radian mote 1 TCx
this is a bigger guess than the last idea mainly due to they may add in the SCx in the greater as well..or possible 2 SCx rather than a TCx.. dunno though.. hell it may have more than 2 ayana leafs.. I'm really bored in networking class =/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
do the recipes constantly follow an algorithm of some sort.. I've got like 5 pieces of paper already covered with bad math =/
oh and if there's a better than greater mana potion I think it'll be something like one of these
SC + TC + ACx + radi shard
SC + TC + ACx + radi shard
i'm opting more for one of the two below
SC + TC + SCx + radi shard
2SC + TC + SCx + radi shard
I put the first two because the ACx didn't jump up to SCx in the third recipe, only the shard jumped up a step