View Full Version : Pwnt X 1000
Nieninque
07-30-2007, 02:05 PM
http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/9163/toyota1ry0.jpg
I forgot how yanks spoke for a second and didn't get it
Parkbandit
07-30-2007, 02:08 PM
Give me a break.
PS - She doesn't have the hooters to actually work at a Hooters imo.
Sean of the Thread
07-30-2007, 02:15 PM
Thought that happened about two years ago. I wonder what the outcome was.
Oh and to touch on what PB said.. the Hooters in Panama City is a dive.
Jayvn
07-30-2007, 02:16 PM
how far are you from pcb sean
CrystalTears
07-30-2007, 02:16 PM
:lol: Awesome.
Celephais
07-30-2007, 02:26 PM
Give me a break.
PS - She doesn't have the hooters to actually work at a Hooters imo.
She certainly has the cold sore to work there though.
thefarmer
07-30-2007, 02:39 PM
Thought that happened about two years ago. I wonder what the outcome was.
Oh and to touch on what PB said.. the Hooters in Panama City is a dive.
I agree with the dive comment.
Yeah this was a while back, I think she lost but I don't remember for sure.
Celephais
07-30-2007, 03:01 PM
http://www.sptimes.com/News/072801/photos/state-yoda.jpg
May 7th, 2002
Unbelievable folks. This is an update to the waitress who thought she won a new Toyota vehicle.
SHE WON the lawsuit! They settled. Jodee Berry, 27, will now get to pick the car of her dreams. I bet she picks a Rav4.
I cannot believe a judge fell for this. I cannot believe that people cannot take a joke anymore. I bet I will get sued for making these statements. It gets more difficult to have fun in this world. Lighten up. Take your yota and get lost, Jodee.
Edit: credit - some random stupid website
didn't fox get in trouble for something similar when they gave some fan at a panthers game a matchbox truck?
TheEschaton
07-30-2007, 07:10 PM
It does seem like false advertising to me, though without a paper ad, it seems like a rather nebulous scenario. A verbal promise to give a "toyota" to whoever sells the most beer in a month. Doesn't seem like a reasonable belief to be real, though lacking the other options ("Toy Yoda" probably being an unreasonable inference to draw) maybe a person would rely on it.
-TheE-
Though she wasn't seemingly too smart, she's the one driving a FUCKING RX-7 now.
AestheticDeath
07-30-2007, 07:32 PM
Did the article ever say how the price was announced? Was it written or verbal?
TheEschaton
07-30-2007, 07:43 PM
Well, if it's written and SAYS "Toyota" instead of "Toy Yoda", then it's no question that she wins. Which is why I imagine that for there to be a question, it was a verbal promise.
Ignot
07-30-2007, 08:55 PM
She certainly has the cold sore to work there though.
She clearly gets taken advantage of everywhere she goes. Workin at Hooters just so they can say that they don't discriminate against small booby girls, gettin the mouth herp from guys taken advantage of her low self esteem, and now she gets tricked into busting her butt for a toy yoda.
Im glad she won because she will most likely suck at life.
Sean of the Thread
07-30-2007, 09:45 PM
how far are you from pcb sean
Clearwater.
Sean of the Thread
07-30-2007, 09:46 PM
http://www.sptimes.com/News/072801/photos/state-yoda.jpg
May 7th, 2002
Unbelievable folks. This is an update to the waitress who thought she won a new Toyota vehicle.
SHE WON the lawsuit! They settled. Jodee Berry, 27, will now get to pick the car of her dreams. I bet she picks a Rav4.
I cannot believe a judge fell for this. I cannot believe that people cannot take a joke anymore. I bet I will get sued for making these statements. It gets more difficult to have fun in this world. Lighten up. Take your yota and get lost, Jodee.
Edit: credit - some random stupid website
Rofl while I can't believe she actually one the suit overall.. I still think the establishment took it a bit to far.
Rofl @ beer sales as a waitress warranting a new car.
Keller
07-31-2007, 08:57 AM
I think the more important analysis, E, is whether she reasonably relied to her detriment.
I can see, maybe, if she didn't take a better job or ended up working 60 hours a week and lost her husband in order to sell enough beer to win the contest.
I think her belief was reasonable, in both that she was being promised a car and that she would actually receive it. I just don't know whether it was to her detriment.
Outside of the law, I think it's fucking funny joke on the part of Hooters and I can't believe she won a lawsuit. I don't even know who to blame for that.
TheEschaton
07-31-2007, 09:03 AM
Depends on what she had to do to sell all that extra beer. Rub a few cold ones on the boobies? Maybe the nips got frostbite, suffered to her detriment. Who knows. ;)
And I thought Hooters settled? That doesn't mean someone actually found in favor for her as a matter of law.
CrystalTears
07-31-2007, 09:04 AM
Maybe it's because I don't automatically believe everything I hear, I wouldn't have believed that I would be winning a car for selling more beer in a job where I'm supposed to help sell beer anyway. I would have totally doubted that and asked to make sure. "Are you seriously giving away a car?!" And then to sue? Oh c'mon.
I'm just curious how many people she potentially overserved or didn't card to get that car.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.