PDA

View Full Version : Top 10 Censored News Stories of 2005



Ebondale
01-28-2006, 09:28 PM
http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0127-01.htm

1. White House Erodes Open Government (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#1)
While the White House has expanded its ability to keep tabs on civilians, it's been working to curtail the ability of the public—and even Congress—to find out what the government is doing. One year ago, Rep. Henry A. Waxman, D-Calif., released an 81-page analysis of how the administration has administered the country's major open government laws. The report found that the feds consistently "narrowed the scope and application" of the Freedom of Information Act, the Presidential Records Act and other key public-information legislation, while expanding laws blocking access to certain records—even creating new categories of "protected" information and exempting entire departments from public scrutiny. When those methods haven't been enough, the administration has simply refused to release records—even when requested by a congressional subcommittee or the Government Accountability Office. Given the news media's interest in safeguarding open government laws, one wonders why these findings weren't publicized far and wide.

2. Media Coverage on Iraq: Fallujah and the Civilian Death Toll (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#2)
The civilized world may well look back on the assaults on Fallujah in 2004 as examples of utter disregard for the most basic wartime rules of engagement. U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour called for an investigation into whether the Americans and their allies had engaged in "the deliberate targeting of civilians, indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks, the killing of injured persons, and the use of human shields," among other possible "grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions" considered war crimes under federal law. More than 83 percent of Fallujah's 300,000 residents fled the city. Men between the ages of 15 and 45 were refused safe passage, and all who remained—about 50,000—were treated as enemy combatants. Numerous sources reported that coalition forces cut off water and electricity, shot at anyone who ventured out into the open, executed families waving white flags while trying to swim across the Euphrates, shot at ambulances, and allowed corpses to rot in the streets and be eaten by dogs. Medical staff reported seeing people with melted faces and limbs, injuries consistent with the use of phosphorous bombs. But you likely know little of this as the media hardly mentioned it.

3. Distorted Election Coverage (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#3)
The mainstream media largely ignored evidence that electronic voting machines were susceptible to tampering (http://www.wanttoknow.info/electronicvoting) and downplayed political alliances (http://www.wanttoknow.info/votingproblems) between the machines' manufacturers and the Bush administration. Then came Nov. 2, 2004. President Bush prevailed by 3 million votes—despite exit polls that projected John Kerry winning by a margin of 5 million. "Exit polls are highly accurate," wrote Professor Steve Freeman of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Organizational Dynamics in an article co-authored with statistician Josh Mitteldorf of Temple University. "They remove most of the sources of potential polling error by identifying actual voters and asking them immediately afterward who they had voted for." The discrepancy of 8 million votes was well beyond the poll's recognized margin of error of less than one percent. The official result deviated by more than five percent, which is considered a statistical impossibility. Freeman and Mitteldorf analyzed the data and found that "only in precincts that used old-fashioned, hand-counted paper ballots did the official count and the exit polls fall within the normal sampling margin of error." The discrepancy between the exit polls and the official count was considerably greater in the critical swing states.

4. Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#4)
It's a well-known dirty trick in the halls of government: If you want to pass unpopular legislation that you know won't stand up to scrutiny, just wait until the public isn't looking. That's precisely what the White House did Dec. 13, 2003, the day American troops captured Saddam Hussein. President Bush celebrated the occasion by privately signing into law the Intelligence Authorization Act—a controversial expansion of the PATRIOT Act that included items culled from the "Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003," a draft proposal that had been shelved due to a public outcry after being leaked. Specifically, the IAA allows the government to obtain an individual's financial records without a court order. The law also makes it illegal for institutions to inform anyone that the government has requested those records, or that information has been shared with the authorities. The law also broadens the definition of "financial institution" to include insurance companies, travel and real estate agencies, stockbrokers, the U.S. Postal Service, jewelry stores, casinos, airlines, car dealerships, and any other business "whose cash transactions have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax or regulatory matters." In one fell swoop, this act has decimated our rights to privacy, due process, and freedom of speech.

5. U.S. Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#5)
The American people reacted to the tsunami that hit the Indian Ocean last December with an outpouring of compassion and private donations. Across the nation, neighbors got together to collect food, clothing, medicine and financial contributions. The White House initially offered an embarrassingly low $15 million in aid. More importantly, the government exploited the catastrophe to its own strategic advantage. Establishing a stronger military presence in the area could help the United States keep closer tabs on China. It could also fortify an important military launching ground and help consolidate control over potentially lucrative trade routes. The United States currently operates a base out of Diego Garcia—a former British mandate about halfway between Africa and Indonesia, but the lease runs out in 2016. Consequently, in the name of relief, the U.S. revived the Utapao military base in Thailand it had used during the Vietnam War and reactivated its military cooperation agreements with Thailand and the Visiting Forces Agreement with the Philippines.

6. The Real Oil for Food Scam (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#6)
The United Nations allegedly allowed Saddam Hussein to rake in $10 billion in illegal cash through the Oil for Food program. New York Times columnist William Safire referred to the alleged U.N. con game as "the richest rip-off in world history." According to the GAO, Hussein smuggled $6 billion worth of oil out of Iraq—most of it through the Persian Gulf. Yet most of the oil that left Iraq by land did so through Jordan and Turkey—with the approval of the United States. The first Bush administration informally exempted Jordan from the ban on purchasing Iraqi oil—an arrangement that provided Hussein with $4.4 billion over 10 years, according to the CIA's own findings. The U.S. later allowed Iraq to leak another $710 million worth of oil through Turkey, all while U.S. planes enforcing no-fly zones flew overhead. Scott Ritter, a U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq during the first six years of economic sanctions against the country, unearthed yet another scam: The United States allegedly allowed an oil company run by Russian foreign minister Yevgeny Primakov's sister to purchase cheap oil from Iraq and resell it to U.S. companies at market value—purportedly earning Hussein "hundreds of millions" more.

7. Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#7)
Last year was the deadliest year for reporters since the International Federation of Journalists began keeping tabs in 1984. A total of 129 media workers lost their lives, and 49 of them—more than a third—were killed in Iraq. As far as anyone has yet proved, no commanding officer ever ordered a subordinate to fire on journalists. But what can be shown is a pattern of tacit complicity, side by side with a heavy-handed campaign to curb journalists' right to roam freely. The Pentagon has refused to implement basic safeguards to protect journalists who aren't embedded with coalition forces, despite repeated requests by Reuters and media-advocacy organizations. To date, U.S. authorities have not disciplined a single officer or soldier involved in the killing of a journalist. Meanwhile, the interim government the United States installed in Iraq raided and closed down Al-Jazeera's Baghdad offices almost as soon as it took power and banned the network from doing any reporting in the country. In November, the interim government ordered news organizations to "stick to the government line on the U.S.-led offensive in Fallujah or face legal action," in an official command sent out on interim prime minister Eyad Allawi's letterhead.

8. Iraqi Farmers Threatened By US Mandates (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#8)
Historians believe it was in the "fertile crescent" where Iraq now lies, that humans first learned to farm. "It is here...that mankind first domesticated wheat," wrote Jeremy Smith in the Ecologist. "The U.S., however, has decided that Iraqis don't know what wheat works best in their own conditions." Smith was referring to Order 81, penned by Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, and left as a legacy by the American government when it transferred operations to interim Iraqi authorities. The regulation sets criteria for the patenting of seeds that can only be met by multinational companies like Monsanto or Syngenta, and it grants the patent holder exclusive rights over every aspect of all plant products yielded by those seeds. The new scheme effectively launches a process whereby Iraqi farmers will soon have to purchase their seeds rather than using seeds saved from their own crops or bought at the local market. Native varieties will be replaced by foreign—and genetically engineered—seeds. Order 81 fit nicely into the outlines of a U.S. "Economy Plan," a 101-page blueprint for the economic makeover of Iraq, formulated with ample help from corporate lobbyists. BBC journalist Greg Palast reported that someone inside the State Department leaked the plan to him a month prior to the invasion. Smith put it simply: "The people whose forefathers first mastered the domestication of wheat will now have to pay for the privilege of growing it for someone else. And with that, the world's oldest farming heritage will become just another subsidiary link in the vast American supply chain."

9. Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#9)
The Bush administration has been paying a lot more attention to Iran recently. Part of that interest is clearly Iran's nuclear program—but there may be more to the story. One bit of news that hasn't received the public attention it merits is Iran's declared intent to open an international oil exchange market, or "bourse." Not only would the new entity compete against the New York Mercantile Exchange and London's International Petroleum Exchange (both owned by American corporations), but it would also ignite international oil trading in euros. A shift away from U.S. dollars to euros in the oil market would cause the demand for petrodollars to drop, perhaps causing the value of the dollar to plummet. Russia, Venezuela and some members of OPEC have expressed interest in moving towards a petroeuro system. And it isn't entirely implausible that China, which is the world's second largest holder of U.S. currency reserves, might eventually follow suit. Barring a U.S. attack, it appears imminent that Iran's euro-dominated oil bourse will open in March 2006. Logically, the most appropriate U.S. strategy is compromise with the EU and OPEC towards a dual-currency system for international oil trades. But you won't hear any discussion of that alternative on the 6 o'clock news.

10. Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy (http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2006/#10)
On Aug. 15, environmental activists created a human blockade by locking themselves to drilling equipment, obstructing the National Coal Corp.'s access to a strip mine in the Appalachian Mountains 40 miles north of Knoxville, Tenn. It was just the latest in a protracted campaign that environmentalists say has national implications, but that's been ignored by the media outside the immediate area. Under contention is a technique wherein entire mountaintops are removed to access the coal underneath—a practice that is nothing short of devastating for the local ecosystem, but which could become much more widespread. As it stands, 93 new coal plants are in the works nationwide. Areas incredibly rich in biodiversity are being turned into the biological equivalent of parking lots. Is this the final solution for 200-million-year-old mountains?

<hr>

I found this link through Fark.com originally. There are more on the website than these Top 10, actually. Follow the link at the top to see the sources.

DCSL
01-28-2006, 09:37 PM
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I am perpetually partyless, but I've felt paranoia setting in these last few years and I find it harder to trust the media, any media. Are they lying? Who is lying? SOMEONE'S lying. There's no way to check any of this, on either side. Anyone could be lying and all too often it is convincingly argued that they all are. I feel so pathetic. Any day now, I'm going to move to Colorado, live in a shack in the mountains, and start stockpiling weapons and food. Ignore me, I'm tired.

Ebondale
01-28-2006, 09:43 PM
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I am perpetually partyless, but I've felt paranoia setting in these last few years and I find it harder to trust the media, any media. Are they lying? Who is lying? SOMEONE'S lying. There's no way to check any of this, on either side. Anyone could be lying and all too often it is convincingly argued that they all are. I feel so pathetic. Any day now, I'm going to move to Colorado, live in a shack in the mountains, and start stockpiling weapons and food. Ignore me, I'm tired.

Last I heard that didn't work out too well for Randy Weaver. Kudos to anyone who knows what I am referring to.

I know exactly how you feel about being unable to trust the media, though. It could be noted that an organization called the Bilderburg Group actually owns the vast majority of the world's media to begin with. Any spin can be put on any news to sway public opinion.

Stepping out of one's door and simply going to work has become a very frightening thing in recent years.

Slider
01-29-2006, 07:48 AM
I wouldn't normally bother to respond to your post, as any disenting opinion or facts seem to get ignored, or labeled as "emo conservative BS" however, your blatant and, to be more accurate, moronic statement in #5 above just pisses me off to no end.

For example, so far the U.S. has pledged 350 million dollars in releif to those countries, wich is 100 million MORE than the World Bank has donated, and far outstrips the 22 million in aid that France has offered. And on February 9, President Bush announced that he is seeking $600 million MORE as part of a supplemental appropriations request to support the rehabilitation and reconstruction of areas devastated by the tsunami and to cover the costs of relief efforts to date.

As far as the U.S. Military using this as some thinly veiled ploy to permanantly re-open the Utapao military base in Thailand, 5 minutes of searching on the internet would have proven this drivel wrong.

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123009746

http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=16914

2/3/2005 - UTAPAO, Thailand (AFPN) -- The U.S. Military support effort for tsunami relief is nearly complete.

Combined Support Force 536 officials announced Feb. 3 that the remaining U.S. military units in the region affected by the Dec. 26 tsunamis will begin redeployment.

On Feb. 10, the country headquarters known as Combined Support Group Indonesia will be disestablished based on the departure of its subordinate military units. The overall Combined Support Force 536 headquarters will be disestablished Feb. 12.

Three days after the tsunamis, U.S. military forces deployed to Thailand, Sri Lanka and Indonesia to provide humanitarian assistance supporting host nation disaster recovery activities, officials said. They helped minimize loss of life and mitigate human suffering while the resources of other U.S. agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and international and regional organizations were brought into the affected areas.

While the redeployment of military forces has begun, some U.S. government efforts continue.

USNS Mercy, with an extensive array of medical and humanitarian capabilities, arrived Feb. 3 and will remain off the coast of Northern Sumatra, Indonesia, to provide relief assistance.

The deployment of U.S. military forces to Southeast Asia was part of a much larger U.S. commitment to providing long-term humanitarian assistance and disaster support, officials said. This assistance and support will continue to be directed by U.S. Agency for International Development, the U.S. government's lead agency for support to the region.

And the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) Battle group will depart the Northern Coast of Sumatra, Indonesia, Feb. 3.

The III Marine Expeditionary Force, the ones who established Camp Red Horse Dec. 28, and transformed a three-building training area to a 55-building complex in less than a month to support Operation Unified Assistance, also have orders to re-deploy as well.


And while your bashing the military, need I point out that since it's arrival on station Jan. 1, Sailors from the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group (ALCSG) worked around the clock to deliver 5,711,866 pounds of relief supplies in just 33 days. Utilizing the 17 helicopters attached to ALCSG, Sailors flew 1,747 relief missions up and down the western coast of Sumatra.

Could you please point out to me one country, just ONE that has done as much to provide aid to this area?

But feel free to ignore all this, after all, why let facts get in the way of a perfectly good theory.

Ebondale
01-29-2006, 12:11 PM
I wouldn't normally bother to respond to your post, as any disenting opinion or facts seem to get ignored, or labeled as "emo conservative BS" however, your blatant and, to be more accurate, moronic statement in #5 above just pisses me off to no end.

Hey dumbass, I didn't write these articles. Are you fucking retarded?

Ebondale
01-29-2006, 12:22 PM
And while your bashing the military, need I point out that since it's arrival on station Jan. 1, Sailors from the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group (ALCSG) worked around the clock to deliver 5,711,866 pounds of relief supplies in just 33 days. Utilizing the 17 helicopters attached to ALCSG, Sailors flew 1,747 relief missions up and down the western coast of Sumatra.

No, no, no. I just had to return here again to laugh at how fucking stupid you are again. I AM MILITARY you stupid fucktard. I volunteered to help load the planes that were going over there to help in the relief effort.

Get out of my gene pool. You're soiling it.

CrystalTears
01-29-2006, 02:12 PM
Perhaps the next time you post a piece like this, you could mention what is or isn't your opinion, and if it's all just a cut and paste that you post something with your point of view on the subject. Just an idea as it could be why he assumed that it was your opinion and went on to explain himself, since you clearly didn't.

If you didn't agree with it, why post it without any criticism? People who post pieces like this who don't state what side they're on makes me feel like they post first then wait for responses to see which side they should lean on.

Your need to call people stupid on something that you didn't agree with all because you weren't clear on it in the first place is getting old.

Ebondale
01-29-2006, 02:25 PM
Getting old? Thats laughable. Ever since I've started actually getting some sleep I've been pretty docile, you know. The only reason I responded the way that I did was because I was wrongly attacked in the first place. If Slider had taken the two seconds that it takes to click the link at the top of my post and look at what it goes to then it would have been pretty obvious that I didn't write any of that myself.

Anyway - I cut and paste all of that so that people could discuss the various points. Not so that I could be attacked about it for a "blatant and moronic statement" that I didn't even write.

Don't you have some poor fast food worker that you'd like to go flame or something?

Warriorbird
01-31-2006, 02:11 PM
Hilarious thread so far.

I think the huge Exxon/Mobil profits are getting covered but they deserve more attention. It's clearly "so hard" for oil companies lately. Especially with Bush in office. That mixed with the gas prices are even making some of my conservative friends take notice.