Just a reminder about how absurd Twitter is

[Tgo01]

Just remember that Twitter banned Trump for saying words, yet all of Russia's government's accounts are still in tact.

And you alt-leftists think nothing of this.

[Gelston]

Just remember that Twitter banned Trump for saying words, yet all of Russia's government's accounts are still in tact.

And you alt-leftists think nothing of this.

What mean things has Russia been saying?

[Tgo01]

What mean things has Russia been saying?

Well you got me there :(

[Gelston]

Well you got me there :(

They do things specifically based on what is said on Twitter. If they removed entire countries because of their foreign interactions, the US probably wouldn't even have a twitter presence. We've invaded more countries than Russia.

[Tgo01]

They do things specifically based on what is said on Twitter. If they removed entire countries because of their foreign interactions, the US probably wouldn't even have a twitter presence. We've invaded more countries than Russia.

Well yeah, this is why they are absurd. They removed Trump for saying mean words, yet they still allow Putin who just invaded an entire country. They still other Russian government accounts who are spreading propaganda about the Ukraine war they themselves started.

[Suppressed Poet]

What mean things has Russia been saying?

On the contrary, Russia is just another chapter of Antifa fighting off the evil Ukrainian Neo-Nazi government. Leftists love that.

[Gelston]

Well yeah, this is why they are absurd. They removed Trump for saying mean words, yet they still allow Putin who just invaded an entire country. They still other Russian government accounts who are spreading propaganda about the Ukraine war they themselves started.

Trump violated their TOS, Russia hasn't, simple as that. What Russia does OFF Twitter has no bearing.

[Tgo01]

Trump violated their TOS, Russia hasn't, simple as that. What Russia does OFF Twitter has no bearing.

Then Twitter should update their TOS. I don't understand what the problem here is.

I am just pointing out what a complete joke Twitter's rules are.

[Gelston]

Then Twitter should update their TOS. I don't understand what the problem here is.

I am just pointing out what a complete joke Twitter's rules are.

Why? Russia hasn't done anything on Twitter. Trump was banned for stuff he posted on Twitter.

[Tgo01]

Why?

Why not? Russia hasn't technically done anything to the US, EU, or the rest of the world outside of Ukraine and yet most of the world is slapping sanctions on Russia.

[Gelston]

Why not? Russia hasn't technically done anything to the US, EU, or the rest of the world outside of Ukraine and yet most of the world is slapping sanctions on Russia.

What does this have to do with Twitter?

[Tgo01]

What does this have to do with Twitter?

Because people/countries are looking for ways to punish Russia for their actions, even if Russia's actions didn't affect them personally. Twitter, unsurprisingly, isn't going to do shit apparently, even though they have shown they are willing to punish a sitting US president for saying words.

[Gelston]

Because people/countries are looking for ways to punish Russia for their actions, even if Russia's actions didn't affect them personally. Twitter, unsurprisingly, isn't going to do shit apparently, even though they have shown they are willing to punish a sitting US president for saying words.

Twitter is objectively neutral. They didn't violate anything on Twitter, they aren't punished by Twitter. Why would they? Trump DID violate Twitter's TOS, and he was removed from it.

[Tgo01]

Twitter is objectively neutral.

Get outta here!

[Gelston]

Get outta here!

I mean, yeah. They aren't banning people for shit they do off twitter. They are banning people for shit they post on twitter. That is just fine to me. Don't like it, don't use twitter.

[Tgo01]

You keep saying Russia didn't violate their TOS, Trump didn't violate their TOS for years until they suddenly made up some bullshit new rules so they could have a reason to boot Trump. Twitter could just as easily make up a new rule saying "If you're part of a government who illegally invaded and occupied another country then we'll ban your accounts."

BOOM! Russia is in violation of Twitter's TOS. But again, which is my entire point, is Twitter is a complete joke and won't do that.

[Gelston]

You keep saying Russia didn't violate their TOS, Trump didn't violate their TOS for years until they suddenly made up some bullshit new rules so they could have a reason to boot Trump. Twitter could just as easily make up a new rule saying "If you're part of a government who illegally invaded and occupied another country then we'll ban your accounts."

BOOM! Russia is in violation of Twitter's TOS. But again, which is my entire point, is Twitter is a complete joke and won't do that.

ok boomer

[Tgo01]

I mean, yeah. They aren't banning people for shit they do off twitter. They are banning people for shit they post on twitter. That is just fine to me. Don't like it, don't use twitter.

Again get outta here! They ban people for "spreading COVID misinformation" yet when leftists make the exact same claims they are fine. When Bill Gates starts espousing medical information or expertise about COVID or vaccines they don't ban him.

They banned people for posting information that came from "hacked" sources yet they allowed posts to stay that mentioned names of people who donated to the trucker convoy even though the information came from hacked sources.

They banned a US news outlet for daring to report on the Hunter Biden scandal.

To suggest they are neutral is laughable.

[Gelston]

Again get outta here! They ban people for "spreading COVID misinformation" yet when leftists make the exact same claims they are fine. When Bill Gates starts espousing medical information or expertise about COVID or vaccines they don't ban him.

They banned people for posting information that came from "hacked" sources yet they allowed posts to stay that mentioned names of people who donated to the trucker convoy even though the information came from hacked sources.

They banned a US news outlet for daring to report on the Hunter Biden scandal.

To suggest they are neutral is laughable.

ok boomer

[Tgo01]

Don't be jelly, gelly.

[Gelston]

Don't be jelly, gelly.

You're the one freaking out about what a private entity does and doesn't do.

[Tgo01]

You're the one freaking out about what a private entity does and doesn't do.

All I said was Twitter is absurd and then proved said absurdity.

I'm not calling out Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart never banned a sitting US president for saying words then gladly kept doing business with Russia. If they had and then they did then I would, but they didn't and they don't so I didn't and won't.

[Gelston]

proved

okay seran

[Tgo01]

okay seran

https://media4.giphy.com/media/3o6wrAgFG1sDdDVbNK/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47ck7lt1xghyvpdbrbz6ws5f20t4is 70lvbz1hax4j&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

[Tgo01]

Can't forget the other joke of a company: YouTube.

Google Faces Sanctions Dilemma With Pro-Russia YouTube Channels (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/google-faces-sanctions-dilemma-with-pro-russia-youtube-channels/ar-AAUgOgf?cvid=361787b50d464ebef316a44b034d4b10)

tl;dr: Google doesn't really want to comply with sanctions against Russia because they are making too much money in the Russian market.

But they had no problem censoring a sitting US president for saying mean words.

[Bhaalizmo]

Can't forget the other joke of a company: YouTube.

Google Faces Sanctions Dilemma With Pro-Russia YouTube Channels (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/google-faces-sanctions-dilemma-with-pro-russia-youtube-channels/ar-AAUgOgf?cvid=361787b50d464ebef316a44b034d4b10)

tl;dr: Google doesn't really want to comply with sanctions against Russia because they are making too much money in the Russian market.

But they had no problem censoring a sitting US president for saying mean words.

You should check out farmersonly.com and ourtime.com for content curated to your world view.

[Parkbandit]

You should check out farmersonly.com and ourtime.com for content curated to your world view.

You should stick to sesamestreet.com for content curated to your intellectual level.

[RyanMatthew]

You bring up an interesting point about the complexities of social media platforms like Twitter and their handling of different accounts and content. The decisions they make in terms of moderation can indeed spark debates about freedom of expression and the perception of fairness.

[RyanMatthew]

You bring up an interesting point about the complexities of social media platforms like Twitter and their handling of different accounts and content. The decisions they make in terms of moderation can indeed spark debates about freedom of expression and the perception of fairness.

It's worth noting that social media platforms often face challenges in striking the right balance between providing a space for diverse opinions while also ensuring that their platforms are not used for harmful or inappropriate content.
Also, if you're looking to enhance your social media presence, you can get instagram followers instant delivery (https://www.smm-world.com/buy-instagram-followers). It's one of the best ways of boosting your account.

[Solkern]

All I said was Twitter is absurd and then proved said absurdity.

I'm not calling out Wal-Mart because Wal-Mart never banned a sitting US president for saying words then gladly kept doing business with Russia. If they had and then they did then I would, but they didn't and they don't so I didn't and won't.

I bet you if Trump broke wal-mart’s policies over and over again, he would get banned.

While they have different policies, they are both a private company, and they decide who uses it and doesn’t use it. That simple.

[Parkbandit]

I bet you if Trump broke wal-mart’s policies over and over again, he would get banned.

While they have different policies, they are both a private company, and they decide who uses it and doesn’t use it. That simple.

It took you 6 months to come up with this post?

[Methais]

It took you 6 months to come up with this post?

Before the bot started posting, the last post in this thread was 1.5 years ago

[Parkbandit]

Before the bot started posting, the last post in this thread was 1.5 years ago

HAHA, didn't even notice the year of tgo01's post.

So it took him a year and a half.

That makes more sense.

[Solkern]

Before the bot started posting, the last post in this thread was 1.5 years ago

I didn’t pay attention to the date of last post.

[Methais]

I didn’t pay attention to the date of last post.

I figured. It happens a lot whenever bots bump old threads.