Another one for you Hypocrites

[Shaps]

Apparently "celebrating" is enough of a reason to remove your mask in contradiction to the EO that Biden just signed.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-asks-why-biden-001201825.html

Arrest him and his family for breaking the EO that he literally signed into effect 24 hours prior.

You support his EOs right? You support and want to "save peoples lives" right?

Get the fuck outa here. LOL. Watching this shit show crumble over the next four years is going to be both sad and hilarious.

[Back]

Fair question. I did not see it for myself but if its true not a good look.

[Shaps]

Fair question. I did not see it for myself but if its true not a good look.

I know right?? Biden wants to kill his family and he doesn't follow the ordnances! Fucker is evil.

[BigWorm]

can someone get kranar to ban the spam bot posting all these random threads in politics? wouldn't be as bad if the spammers used a more modern text generation algorithm but it must be something out of date because the posts make no sense

[Bhaalizmo]

can someone get kranar to ban the spam bot posting all these random threads in politics? wouldn't be as bad if the spammers used a more modern text generation algorithm but it must be something out of date because the posts make no sense

While I agree with the sentiment, I'm not sure we have any active moderation here.

Kranar hasn't done shite or shinola around here in months, has he?

[Shaps]

While I agree with the sentiment, I'm not sure we have any active moderation here.

Kranar hasn't done shite or shinola around here in months, has he?

Get back to posting videos in the "Fuck Trump" thread Bhaalizmo. You would support censorship.

[Bhaalizmo]

Get back to posting videos in the "Fuck Trump" thread Bhaalizmo. You would support censorship.

Tongue punch my gristle doughnut, shit for brains.

[Shaps]

Tongue punch my gristle doughnut, shit for brains.

I'm pretty sure that's hate speech. Hate speech is not allowed. Your Twitter will be immediately suspended.

[Tgo01]

While I agree with the sentiment, I'm not sure we have any active moderation here.

Kranar hasn't done shite or shinola around here in months, has he?

The guy who posts several times a day to ogle at half naked women and spams his own "Fuck Trump!" thread several times a day suddenly wants moderation for people who post "too much."

Let me guess, like the typical hypocritical Democrat douche bag that you are you don't want the rules to apply to you right? Democrats are the absolute worst.

[Ashliana]

We know you're super butthurt that Trump lost, Dreaven, but holy fuck, get some perspective. You have the next four years to be upset. Pace yourself.

[Shaps]

Oh not by a long shot. Hopefully we'll get leaked footage, insider sources, or unnamed sources who report on the vile misogynists' activities. I see where his son got his "proclivities".

https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2014/08/01/biden-swims-naked-upsetting-female-secret-service-agents-book-claims

Pretty soon he's going to get Bill Clinton'd! Oh wait.. I'm sure it will all come out in the Impeachment hearings. Da Da Daaaaaa **dramatic theme music plays**

[Astray]

Are you okay dude? Like seriously.

[Tgo01]

We know you're super butthurt that Trump lost, Dreaven, but holy fuck, get some perspective. You have the next four years to be upset. Pace yourself.

You’re as tiresome as ever. This isn’t an invitation to get into a 10+ page argument so don’t bother trying.

[Ashliana]

Your dozen-plus threads on the front page are also tiresome. And you haven't pointed out Democratic "hypocrisy" once, despite your numerous attempts, so....

[Shaps]

Your dozen-plus threads on the front page are also tiresome. And you haven't pointed out Democratic "hypocrisy" once, despite your numerous attempts, so....

The above statement is the most hypocritical of all. LOL

Amazing watching you. Like some animal that eats their own shit and thinks it's a five course meal. Please don't ever stop being you.

[BriarFox]

Jeez, you take away the orange pumpkin with "Yur special" written on it and some people here fucking implode.

[Ashliana]

The above statement is the most hypocritical of all. LOL

Amazing watching you. Like some animal that eats their own shit and thinks it's a five course meal. Please don't ever stop being you.

1) You didn't actually lay out, in any way, how that statement was "hypocritical" (do you even know what that word means?)

2) Seek psychiatric care.

[Tgo01]

Jeez, you take away the orange pumpkin with "Yur special" written on it and some people here fucking implode.

Ashliana has always been this bat shit crazy.

[Ashliana]

Ashliana has always been this bat shit crazy.

Psst. That was referring to your deranged behavior after Trump lost.

[~Rocktar~]

Psst. That was referring to your deranged behavior after Trump lost.

Psst. The statement is accurate. Yet again you try to divert, make no real argument and then claim some form of pyrrhic victory while engaging in an orgy of self aggrandizement and back slapping. I know why you don't seek help, the help quit and changed careers.

[Solkern]

Psst. The statement is accurate. Yet again you try to divert, make no real argument and then claim some form of pyrrhic victory while engaging in an orgy of self aggrandizement and back slapping. I know why you don't seek help, the help quit and changed careers.

Ashliana has been making non-stop real arguments and points with fact and evidence to back up those arguments. You and others, only reply with insults, deflections and more insults, instead of giving us any sort of real facts, evidence or solid points, to refute the points Ashliana has made.

[Tgo01]

Ashliana has been making non-stop real arguments and points with fact and evidence to back up those arguments.

Is this the new political laugh thread?

[Solkern]

Is this the new political laugh thread?

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

[Tgo01]

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

I lost the patience to read most of his posts long ago. I will sometimes read one in the same way you can’t help but look at a gruesome car accident. He’s much like you; he will argue incessantly over nitpicky things for pages then claim he made some great points when the other person stops replying to his nonsense.

[Solkern]

I lost the patience to read most of his posts long ago. I will sometimes read one in the same way you can’t help but look at a gruesome car accident. He’s much like you; he will argue incessantly over nitpicky things for pages then claim he made some great points when the other person stops replying to his nonsense.

My point exactly, you can’t find anything, because none of you refute anything he says with substance, just insults and attacks, so once again you did a classic deflect with some insults.

[Realk]

Oh not by a long shot. Hopefully we'll get leaked footage, insider sources, or unnamed sources who report on the vile misogynists' activities. I see where his son got his "proclivities".

https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2014/08/01/biden-swims-naked-upsetting-female-secret-service-agents-book-claims

Pretty soon he's going to get Bill Clinton'd! Oh wait.. I'm sure it will all come out in the Impeachment hearings. Da Da Daaaaaa **dramatic theme music plays**


I'm probably ignorant, but if he wants to swim nekkid shouldn't he have just told them(both sexes) to turn their backs to the pool until he says other wise(i think that's where the danger would be anyways?) maybe except one dude to make sure he doesn't and drown or some shit.

might be another unpopular thought... if that's all it took to make the agents uncomfortable, are they in the right profession and do I want to trust them with my life?

[~Rocktar~]

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

Show me a time when it made a real argument with facts that aren't from a Leftwing shill site or made up assertions from it's fevered head.

[Parkbandit]

Please, find me the last time someone on the right you, rocktar, PB, whoever, refuted a point or comment Ashliana has made, with fact/evidence to back up their point, without the insults and/or provided links/sources.

You would probably have to go back pre-Kierphe days for that. Circa October 2010.

After it was found out that It was using dual accounts to agree with Itself, It pretty much lost the tiny remaining respect anyone had for It.

[Ashliana]

Psst. The statement is accurate. Yet again you try to divert, make no real argument and then claim some form of pyrrhic victory while engaging in an orgy of self aggrandizement and back slapping. I know why you don't seek help, the help quit and changed careers.

:rofl: There's nothing to "divert" from, as this thread isn't a substantive discussion, but you did manage to pay us a visit to do just the same thing you're claiming I do. Somebody didn't read the thread and jumped in too eagerly, did they?


I lost the patience to read most of his posts long ago. I will sometimes read one in the same way you can’t help but look at a gruesome car accident. He’s much like you; he will argue incessantly over nitpicky things for pages then claim he made some great points when the other person stops replying to his nonsense.

Sure you did. And what you call "arguing over nitpicky things" are, in reality, other people making demonstrably incorrect points and being unable to move on or adapt their position.


Show me a time when it made a real argument with facts that aren't from a Leftwing shill site or made up assertions from it's fevered head.

I cite from government sites whenever possible (including government sources backed by, at the time, Trump appointees), and deliberately cite right-wing sources like Fox as well, specifically to undercut the retarded "(Saw Centrist Source, Get to Ignore Article, Even if Article is Documenting Something Not In Question) strategy you people rely on. You post InfoWars links unironically. Does someone need to explain the difference to you?


You would probably have to go back pre-Kierphe days for that. Circa October 2010.

After it was found out that It was using dual accounts to agree with Itself, It pretty much lost the tiny remaining respect anyone had for It.

Nope, happens all the time. (Thanks, Solkern). You became completely divorced from reality when you couldn't cope with the Obama administration winning twice, and rather than actually lay out and defend coherent arguments, you come to your last resort in every thread. Speaking of which..

https://i.imgur.com/ABSNHER.png

[~Rocktar~]

:rofl: There's nothing to "divert" from, as this thread isn't a substantive discussion, but you did manage to pay us a visit to do just the same thing you're claiming I do. Somebody didn't read the thread and jumped in too eagerly, did they?



Sure you did. And what you call "arguing over nitpicky things" are, in reality, other people making demonstrably incorrect points and being unable to move on or adapt their position.



I cite from government sites whenever possible (including government sources backed by, at the time, Trump appointees), and deliberately cite right-wing sources like Fox as well, specifically to undercut the retarded "(Saw Centrist Source, Get to Ignore Article, Even if Article is Documenting Something Not In Question) strategy you people rely on. You post InfoWars links unironically. Does someone need to explain the difference to you?



Nope, happens all the time. (Thanks, Solkern). You became completely divorced from reality when you couldn't cope with the Obama administration winning twice, and rather than actually lay out and defend coherent arguments, you come to your last resort in every thread. Speaking of which..

https://i.imgur.com/ABSNHER.png

The bullshit is deep here. You don't cite much of anything, 99% of your recent posts are just you discounting what is said and proclaiming yourself victor. GEFO.

[Shaps]

Psst. That was referring to your deranged behavior after Trump lost.

Hey listen, I've sat outside multiple businesses yelling, screaming, crying, and protesting that Biden won. How could this evil, evil man win??? Wahhh Wahhh. Oh wait...

LOL. STFU. It's like you forgot all the wonderful memes of 2016 - and the remaining 4 years of hysteria after Trump won. This is the mirror you all hate to see. It's funny seeing you try to act normal now. ROFL.

[Ashliana]

The bullshit is deep here. You don't cite much of anything, 99% of your recent posts are just you discounting what is said and proclaiming yourself victor. GEFO.

Beeteedubs, my "recent" posts on here have been the result of the hee-hawing circlejerk of Trump apologists, all of whom are hopping mad that Trump's incompetence led the GOP to fall out of power in every respect for the first time in 13 years and, like you, prefer to just take swipes at the person individually rather than any position they've taken up. It takes two to reduce the quality of an exchange.

But since I love proving right-wing conspiracy theory-swilling idiots like you wrong, let's check my last few citations. Fox, Trump's Department of Justice (government), NIH (government), Nature (the most authoritative scientific journal in the world), New England Journal of Medicine (most authoritative medical journal in the US).

You were saying? What's that? You invented an argument out of fat air? Where are the "leftist shill sites" you just asserted I rely on?
https://media.giphy.com/media/xUPGcz2H1TXdCz4suY/giphy.gif

It's almost like you just make shit up for the sake of argument. Who knew?


Hey listen, I've sat outside multiple businesses yelling, screaming, crying, and protesting that Biden won. How could this evil, evil man win??? Wahhh Wahhh. Oh wait...

LOL. STFU. It's like you forgot all the wonderful memes of 2016 - and the remaining 4 years of hysteria after Trump won. This is the mirror you all hate to see. It's funny seeing you try to act normal now. ROFL.

:rofl: I know your reality has been shattered, but you really need to put things into perspective.

[Shaps]

Beeteedubs, my "recent" posts on here have been the result of the hee-hawing circlejerk of Trump apologists, all of whom are hopping mad that Trump's incompetence led the GOP to fall out of power in every respect for the first time in 13 years and, like you, prefer to just take swipes at the person individually rather than any position they've taken up. It takes two to reduce the quality of an exchange.

But since I love proving right-wing conspiracy theory-swilling idiots like you wrong, let's check my last few citations. Fox, Trump's Department of Justice (government), NIH (government), Nature (the most authoritative scientific journal in the world), New England Journal of Medicine (most authoritative medical journal in the US).

You were saying? What's that? You invented an argument out of fat air? Where are the "leftist shill sites" you just asserted I rely on?
https://media.giphy.com/media/xUPGcz2H1TXdCz4suY/giphy.gif

It's almost like you just make shit up for the sake of argument. Who knew?



:rofl: I know your reality has been shattered, but you really need to put things into perspective.

Why? Does my insanity bother you? Do my theories and calls of Biden for his corruption and hate bother you? Does my continued complaining about his horrible decisions bother you? Do they? Do they? Do they?

ROFL. Keep making sure you follow the party line or Chairman Mao will come for you.

[Ashliana]

Why? Does my insanity bother you? Do my theories and calls of Biden for his corruption and hate bother you? Does my continued complaining about his horrible decisions bother you? Do they? Do they? Do they?

ROFL. Keep making sure you follow the party line or Chairman Mao will come for you.

Who do you imagine the left-wingers on here were posting akin to the way you are after Trump won in 2016, thus justifying your current behavior? I'm quite interested in the examples you're using to rationalize the dozen-plus threads on here you've spammed up the folder with.

[~Rocktar~]

Who do you imagine the left-wingers on here were posting akin to the way you are after Trump won in 2016, thus justifying your current behavior? I'm quite interested in the examples you're using to rationalize the dozen-plus threads on here you've spammed up the folder with.

All of you for years.

[Ashliana]

All of you for years.

Ah. Couldn't address what I said about the sources, could you? What's that word I'm trying to think of...? Related to your inability to defend your position and instead you opting to just drop it? ... Oh. A concession. How lovely.

Incidentally, no, nobody on here created a dozen-plus RHEE!ing threads to shit up the folder like Shaps has done in a single week.

[~Rocktar~]

Ah. Couldn't address what I said about the sources, could you? What's that word I'm trying to think of...? Related to your inability to defend your position and instead you opting to just drop it? ... Oh. A concession. How lovely.

Incidentally, no, nobody on here created a dozen-plus RHEE!ing threads to shit up the folder like Shaps has done in a single week.

There is a difference in couldn't which is your ASSumption and won't. You deserve no more response than you get and yes you (you included) all did go off your fucking rocker crazier than you usually are with posts galore. Cry moar bytch.

[Ashliana]

There is a difference in couldn't which is your ASSumption and won't. You deserve no more response than you get and yes you (you included) all did go off your fucking rocker crazier than you usually are with posts galore. Cry moar bytch.

You made an assertion, couldn't back it up, then lashed out personally. Perhaps next time you'll more carefully choose your position so you don't get embarrassed again.

[Parkbandit]

You made an assertion

https://media4.giphy.com/media/26ufbPfKs0Uw7wdKU/source.gif

[~Rocktar~]

You made an assertion, couldn't back it up, then lashed out personally. Perhaps next time you'll more carefully choose your position so you don't get embarrassed again.

You made an assumption and made yourself look like an ass. Perhaps next time you will shut the fuck up.

When you post, this always comes to mind. "Better to remain silent and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -- Mark Twain

[Ashliana]

You made an assumption and made yourself look like an ass. Perhaps next time you will shut the fuck up.

When you post, this always comes to mind. "Better to remain silent and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -- Mark Twain

What "assumption" would that be? :rofl: Nothing you said addresses what I did: You made an assumption, were challenged to back it up, and spectacularly failed. No amount of your mental gymnastics changes that. Perhaps next time you'll more carefully choose your position so you don't get embarrassed again.

[~Rocktar~]

What "assumption" would that be? :rofl: Nothing you said addresses what I did: You made an assumption, were challenged to back it up, and spectacularly failed. No amount of your mental gymnastics changes that. Perhaps next time you'll more carefully choose your position so you don't get embarrassed again.

Yep, keep up your mantra of late, side step or dismiss anything said, add a distraction and claim false victory. At least you are consistent, too bad it's consistently useless.

[Ashliana]

Yep, keep up your mantra of late, side step or dismiss anything said, add a distraction and claim false victory. At least you are consistent, too bad it's consistently useless.

You're the one who keeps trying to get away from the reality that you made an assumption you couldn't, or wouldn't, defend. Conceding. So you're either going for the world record in lack of self-awareness, or you can't read. Which is it?

[Back]

You're the one who keeps trying to get away from the reality that you made an assumption you couldn't, or wouldn't, defend. Conceding. So you're either going for the world record in lack of self-awareness, or you can't read. Which is it?

Good job on the fact check whack a mole over the past couple of weeks. You've got more patience than I do.

[~Rocktar~]

Good job on the fact check whack a mole over the past couple of weeks. You've got more patience than I do.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Fact check . . . AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

[Bhaalizmo]

Good job on the fact check whack a mole over the past couple of weeks. You've got more patience than I do.

Agreed. It has been on point and not very effectively argued against, which is to be expected I guess, but is also moderately amusing.