What is your favorite profession to play?

[Zanagodly]

[CrystalTears]

Rogues rule! :D

[Taernath]

Wizards. They have a lot of fun spells and abilities.

[Savanae]

I find myself playing my rogue more offen. Second in line is my warrior.

[Razarn]

Definately my cleric

[Tendarian]

Always my rogue now. Notice rogues and clerics are the most popular? Also the most diverse professions there are. Hope they dont kill that in gs4.

[Parkbandit]

Rogues do rule.

[Gokkem]

Rogues rule now, but I have a feeling the changes to ambush will put them back in line with the rest of the professions. Even though I play(ed) an ambushing ranger, I think ambush is grossly overpowered as it stands.

Gokkem, who is now waiting for all the rogues to rip his head off for daring to saw ambush is overpowered.

[Parkbandit]

Originally posted by Gokkem
Rogues rule now, but I have a feeling the changes to ambush will put them back in line with the rest of the professions. Even though I play(ed) an ambushing ranger, I think ambush is grossly overpowered as it stands.

Gokkem, who is now waiting for all the rogues to rip his head off for daring to saw ambush is overpowered.

I agree and always have. Ambushing is way overpowered. I just hope they don't completely ruin the skill with the change.

[Warriorbird]

Glad my Rogue is archery based. Though, I'd have been pissed if tripling hiding had gone away.

[AnticorRifling]

I would say Anticor is still my favorite to play (wizard) but a close second is my rogue he's a blast. I've also got a warrior that I use more for RP than anything else. If you see a dwarf warrior complainin about the dark elf smell in the landing you'll know it's me :cool:

[Captain Amby]

I LOVE being da warpuff I am. Mainly because I was told for many years it couldnt be dun. I can beat da pants off most folks around my age and I wear brig (gunna get better once I a lil older) I hunt all the time. Currently I'm 48 n huntin' craptors n leopards in ta illistim that are 60 or so. This by far has been da most challenging and rewarding outta everything I've tried.

[DeV]

I recently rolled Rogue and having all sorts of fun with that character. All time fav is Sorcerer though, Rogue a close second.

[AnticorRifling]

Wizard that is played my way(haste swinging ) is still my favorite. Lately I've been favoring my dwarf bard over my rogue....

[Solkern]

Cleric is my favorite profession, they can do so damn much, Swing as hard as anyone else, THey have a vast range of attack spells, spells to fuck around with people, blind, bind and silence. and more, They can save people, clerics give you more options then any other profession out there.

[DCSL]

Rogue! I *love* my two edged/brawling weapon-using, ambushing rogue. Although my highest level character currently is a bard... who I love as well. I just started with rogue and I still have a soft spot in my heart for the profession.

[Stunseed]

I think profession wise, I'd still choose my Ranger. Starting off was a wee bit off. At 40, I've got the swing and redux of a Warrior, the added bonus of evade, block, parry, and Wall of Thorns, and once I master Hamstring......Well, I might just let it get to my head.

Next is prolly my Wizard, mainly because it's a great way to realize how lucky I am to just swing as a Ranger. However, through the trains I've worked my Wizard, he's become a close second to the Ranger.

I think I'd enjoy playing a Bard, too. I also enjoy the RP of my Cleric.

Love you Jolena!

[Overlord]

I liked my cleric before, don't see many 2 handin war clerics around so i figured I'd have a blast as a Marlu worshiping war cleric. Turned out to be tons of fun, run out bravery benediction warding sphere and what not. Come back from hunt meditate repeat. Then there was the evil resurection with the sacrificial blade.

Aha but then theres my warrior, lots of fun being a tank in all respects, coupled with guild skills an all around fun profession. Hmm brief but to the point i suppose.

My weezard! Lots of spells to play around with, familiars (and gate), enchanting, invis, and other spells with great RP potential.

Sorcs n Rogues are fun but I suppose i just find it a little easy *shrugs* just my opinion.

Hopefully I'll be changing my cleric to a paladin when the option rolls around, hes currently a pure spell caster (bah Gs4 changes made it a little difficult for my training path to be viable) Im just curious to see what the paladin circle will be like before i make my final desicsion.

[Zeyrin]

I started with a sorcerer which will be fun when he get old but my favorite character is my dwarven cleric. Clerics are very versitle and I love playing a heretic.

[Breager]

Rogues are the best, definately. But I find myslef playing my little empath a lot lately. Spells are fun too

[Souzy]

Rogues are fun, sorcerer's are fun and wizard's are fun. All in that order.

[Izalude]

I have more fun hunting and RPing as my wizard now over my rogue. The first 30 trains were tough to get through due to my training choices (I trained him to be optimized BEFORE reallocation.) Once I started hunting rotting corpses, things got easy. It's been a breeze ever since.

My rogue was alot of fun to play as well. He's more fun to bring out during invasions due to his training, but overall I have alot more fun playing my wizard.

[The Cat In The Hat]

Well, I just started my Dhe'nar rogue, and since she wont let anyone herl her thats not Dhe'nar it frustrates me that she's injured all the time LOL

She's a blast to play so far, I kinda like haveing the "You're not good enough to be my footstool" mentality since my main's an Empath thats WAY too goody goody.

Cat

[Xcalibur]

Huh?

[FinisWolf]

Man, this was a seriously tough decision!

I think Finis (warrior) is my absolute fav, maybe more because I started with him, but he is one mean hombre, and I love that about him.

My rogue has to be second, with his guild skills, and cman.

My wizard would be third.

But to be honest, they are all great. Depends on my mood, depends on what aspects of the game I want to enjoy... it just depends...

I have at least one of every profession, some 2 and 3, so I can have different styles...

So, yes, a very difficult decision.

Finiswolf

[Fallen]

Sorcerer, forever and always.

[Asha]

Sorcerer and ranger.

[Keller]

Fucking Crist X -- I appriciate you not starting yet another favorite/best profession threads -- but can you quit?



Nice to see your H key working again, though.

[allen]

Wizards have the most interesting spells.

[Divinity]

I don't know, it's kind of a toss up between Ranger and Sorcerer.

[Gan]

Rogue is my favorite... but I have to agree with Finis in that alot depends on my mood because each has a somewhat different persona.

[StrayRogue]

Rogue too. A rogue can use magic, be a tank, an archer, a thief, a locksmith or a mix of everything.

[ElanthianSiren]

Empath
Rogue
Ranger

but oddly enough my warrior is my highest trained character?

I love my empath because she's a great hunter and fun to RP.

Rogues are just plain awesome. They have the best CMAN moves. They have the best training path options, and they are more efficient than other professions because they can protect (leg) for the group or solo (hide ambush).

Rangers I simply enjoy as a change. I like their spells.

-Melissa

[Chadj]

Older wizards (40+) are fun as hell to play around with, but bards are still the best.

[Edited on 4-3-2005 by Chadj]

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Rogue too. A rogue can use magic, be a tank

And sux.

GS4's rogue = obligation to forgot the idea of being a magical EFFECTIVE rogue or a tanking rogue.

[StrayRogue]

Er? You know shit.

I know rogues with more spells than most rangers who do fucking well.

Being a tank is pretty much the standard as well. You fucking retard.

[Xcalibur]

I know shit. Shit is the thing that comes out of your asshole.

Rogues with more spells than most rangers? Most rangers bellow level 20? Sure

TAnk? And sux, yeah, that's what I said.

[StrayRogue]

Please post your evidence.

Oh I forgot you don't have any.

Theres a number of rogues out there with well over 40 spells.

As for tanks, I can name a few pretty easily.

[Xcalibur]

40 spells? That's 40 spells. 40 *67 =2680 tps. And to be able to cast those, you need at least 40 mana, and that's around 90 mtp more.

A ranger for 40 spells? 40*17 = 680. That's right, almost 5 times less.

That makes a ranger at 40 having more spells than a rogue at 90-100.

P.s. You're seeing Straycat using false numbers/presomptions AGAIN to prove his point.

Straycat cannot be wrong in Straycat's world.



[Edited on 3-4-05 by Xcalibur]

[StrayRogue]

And your point is?

I said I know rogues with more spells than most rangers. That point still stands. I didn't say MOST rogues. I didn't say LOW LEVEL rogues. You fucking dumbass.

But please, post how your experience in GS4, considering you've just started playing again, is different to this? I mean you must have gotten to a pretty high level in a month. Unless of course you've been lying again.

[Edaarin]

Originally posted by Xcalibur

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Rogue too. A rogue can use magic, be a tank

And sux.

GS4's rogue = obligation to forgot the idea of being a magical EFFECTIVE rogue or a tanking rogue.

Edaarin at level 86

E-wave, pick, disarm, with redux, and still get fried in less than 3 minutes of hunting.

[StrayRogue]

BUT YOU SUC EDAARIN.

[Xcalibur]

WHATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT?

HOLY SHIT STOP BEING YOURSELF FOR A SECOND!

A level 95 rogue with 40 spells is most likely to be better than a fucking level 40 ranger, idiotic thing.

Main raison: HE'S HAVING 55 LEVELS more than the rangers.

Oh, damn, never mind...

Never mind.

And if you didn't understood the 2 first times: Never mind.

p.s. You'll get no information about my character (s) of whom I played.

No information at all, including to all of your "spies". (it goes that far... :( )

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by Edaarin

Originally posted by Xcalibur

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Rogue too. A rogue can use magic, be a tank

And sux.

GS4's rogue = obligation to forgot the idea of being a magical EFFECTIVE rogue or a tanking rogue.

Edaarin at level 86

E-wave, pick, disarm, with redux, and still get fried in less than 3 minutes of hunting.

e-wave = level 10 spells.

That's 30 less spells.

And that's brighter.

[StrayRogue]

You've been playing a month, of course if you haven't been lying. So you won't know anything about high level playing.

Second of all, where in my post, and I want you show me where in my post, did I say a high level rogue is or is not better than a lower level ranger. I said, for the third time, I know some rogues with more spells than most rangers. Do you understand? Or do you want me to say it for a fourth time?

[Edaarin]

Doesn't mean it isn't viable to be a magical rogue.

If I was still playing, I could configure a level 90 rogue to have 410 and 117. Would have to sacrifice a lot of AS and almost all picking, but would be pretty nasty hunting.

[Xcalibur]

It's impossible.

To have 40 spells a rogue need over 2600 mtps.

To have 40 spells, a ranger needs 700 mtps.

A level 40 rogue cannot surpase a level 40 ranger.

If you consider level by level.

If you don't consider levels, then your points isn't working, capiche now?

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by Edaarin
Doesn't mean it isn't viable to be a magical rogue.

If I was still playing, I could configure a level 90 rogue to have 410 and 117. Would have to sacrifice a lot of AS and almost all picking, but would be pretty nasty hunting.

Would you enjoyed being so specialiazed?

The point of playing a rogue is to have many options to "fry" (And/or have fun)?

GS4 closed many doors ...

[Edited on 3-4-05 by Xcalibur]

[StrayRogue]

Idiot.

I said I know rogues with more spells than most rangers. Where exactly does level come into this?

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Idiot.

I said I know rogues with more spells than most rangers. Where exactly does level come into this?

But it's so stupid to say that man...

I know some warriors that got more spells than Wizards...

:rolleyes:

[StrayRogue]

Most wizards? I doubt that. ANyway. Who?

[Xcalibur]

Yeah most wizard of X level.

The name? not important.

The fact is, all wizard of the X level I'm thinking got less spells than at least 2 warriors.

And levels isn't a consideration, so that could mean the wizards are level 0 and the warriors are level 100.

Man, that is so stupid, poor him, he's trying EVERYTHING he knows to be right.

:penis:

[StrayRogue]

The problem is X, I specified MOST. How is level 0 most of anything?

Read the post you fucking retard. :kick:

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Idiot.

I said I know rogues with more spells than most rangers. Where exactly does level come into this?

^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

lie

[StrayRogue]

Originally posted by Xcalibur

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Idiot.

I said I know rogues with more spells than most rangers. Where exactly does level come into this?

^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

lie

Unfortunately not.

In posts 339557, 339552, 339547 and 339541 I said without edit "I know some rogues who have more spells than MOST rangers". How is that a lie?

[Xcalibur]

That is false.

You don't know any rogues that got more spells than MOST rangers.

Rangers in the 900 fame ranks

Rank| Name | Fame |Lvl|G| Race
---------------------------------------------
902 Radhruin 16095534 51 M HalfElf
907 Belnia 16046379 55 F Human
909 Zendy 16039718 56 F DarkElf
923 Charna 15825584 61 F HalfElf
927 Heuward 15677947 57 M HalfElf
931 Gahlend 15647956 54 M Human
933 Wormdoc 15556059 66 F Human
945 Sorkin 15399389 54 M Human
956 Breeze 15215425 56 M DarkElf
959 Gallahan 15181837 55 M Human
978 Roelon 14824870 60 M Giant
981 Jesp 14810758 53 M HalfElf
996 Shern 14547777 53 M Giant
997 Abelrahr 14547658 53 M Human

Around level : 55..

Assuming spell knowns: 56.

Rogues than can know more than 55 spells: none.

[StrayRogue]

Wrong.

[StrayRogue]

And since when did the end of the fame list equal the average age of all rangers?

[Xcalibur]

An average player in gemstone is on the fame list.

[StrayRogue]

Says who?

[Xcalibur]

Says an average player.

[StrayRogue]

A player whose been playing a month? You're not the average player. Nor will you be on the fame list.

Secondly, why would an average player know about the average level of a certain profession?

Oh wait, they wouldn't. Silly me.

[Xcalibur]

I had 3 different characters on the fame list.

I was an average player.

Since I never changed my way of playing, I am still, an average player.

You lost, admit it, thing.

[StrayRogue]

In GS3. GS3 doesn't mean shit in a discussion about professions in GS4. And exactly how do you determine the fact you're an average player? How exactly do you know how often the average player even plays?

[Xcalibur]

Define an average player.

The majority of people playing gemstone will recognize themselves in the definitions.

I am an average player.

[StrayRogue]

So you say. I'm willing to be you're not.

But you've answered my question: you do not know the average level of a ranger in GS.

Thanks for playing.

[HarmNone]

Stray, in my opinion, if you argue with a fish you get bubbles in response. I think you're seeing the verbal equivalent of bubbles. ;)

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
So you say. I'm willing to be you're not.

But you've answered my question: you do not know the average level of a ranger in GS.

Thanks for playing.

Anytime, bro.

[StrayRogue]

Yeah its evident that none of his arguments today have had either proof or logic to back them up. But its funny watching him dig his own grave.

[Hips]

Ranger / wizard.

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Yeah its evident that none of his arguments today have had either proof or logic to back them up. But its funny watching him dig his own grave.

You're a lying piece of yourself.

Some rogues doesn't know more spells than most rangers.

But if in your book some = 2 and most = 5, you're right.

I'm betting my ol' 2 bucks it's something along those lines, thing

[StrayRogue]

No, I'm not. Some rogues have more spells than most rangers, IE, some rogues have upwards of 60+ spells.

[Xcalibur]

Define some.

[StrayRogue]

Three or four.

[Xcalibur]

So 3 or 4 rogues got more spells than MOST rangers?

Ok....

All this for 3-4 rogues..

Some for me would be more than 0,0008% of the population, but hey...

[StrayRogue]

Did I specify how many? NO. I said SOME you fucking cretic. Reinforcing my point that magic using rogues are not only viable but gimped in anyway shape or form. But what the fuck would you know anyway? You're neither high level or knowledgable enough to make that sort of assessment.

[Xcalibur]

Yeah, some = 0,0005% of the gs's population.

Gotcha.

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
Did I specify how many? NO. I said SOME you fucking cretic. Reinforcing my point that magic using rogues are not only viable but gimped in anyway shape or form. But what the fuck would you know anyway? You're neither high level or knowledgable enough to make that sort of assessment.

You said some fucking cretin? They are fucking cretins, now?

HOLY SHIT MAN STOP BEING YOURSELF

[Edited on 3-4-05 by Xcalibur]

[StrayRogue]

Yes, some you fucking tool.

some Pronunciation Key (sm)
adj.
Being an unspecified number or quantity: Some people came into the room. Would you like some sugar?
Being a portion or an unspecified number or quantity of a whole or group: He likes some modern scupture but not all.
Being a considerable number or quantity: She has been directing films for some years now.
Unknown or unspecified by name: Some man called.
Logic. Being part and perhaps all of a class.
Informal. Remarkable: She is some skier.

[StrayRogue]

You always do this. You can't post a decent come back or proof or a logical reply, so you just do some fucking retarded goof post.

Well done.

[Xcalibur]

Yeah, like you.

But I don't post false things or presomptions, I change the subject.

[StrayRogue]

Where have I changed the subject, posted false things or "presomptions"?

I'll tell you that YOU have posted false things, changed the subject and made presumptions.

Such as that the avergae player is on the fame list: presumption
That a magic rogue is unviable: presumption
You were on the fame board: false
You're stupid hippie post: changed the subject.

Face it, when you're beaten, you just react by posting utter BS.

[Xcalibur]

Average player is on the fame list: Right.

When gs3 was being transformed in gs4, they put something about a triangle showing the average player's level. Then they said the majority was considering 75 in gs3 as being the average level to be.

Then they based it on a level 75 game, remember?

The average was surely a bit lower, I'd say around level 50.

So now, I'd say the average is around 45-50

Magic rogue with 40 spells is unviable, beside if you're already 100.

Fame list: True, 3 times.

Hippie post: Yourself, cobaye (guynay pig, whatever you say it in english)

[Keller]

This time I go to bed, wake up, and this? Fucking Christ ignore him. It's obvious at this point that he's seeking attention. He's like Warclaidhm except a tad more than just mildly retarded. Let dead dogs die.

[StrayRogue]

40 spells prior to 100 unviable? Tell that to Nodyre.

They changed it to 75 because it was roughly half the max cap. Not the considered average level to be.

3 time? I doubt that considering you never got above 60.

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by StrayRogue
40 spells prior to 100 unviable? Tell that to Nodyre.

They changed it to 75 because it was roughly half the max cap. Not the considered average level to be.

3 time? I doubt that considering you never got above 60.

Never got above 60? ARE YOU SURE OF THAT?

The average in gs3 was SAID TO BE 75.

Use your damn memory.

6 months later, the average should be around 50.

And there's more and more of capped players and less and less of new players.

[StrayRogue]

Yes, you've posted about your bitch wizard many atime as he was your "oldest". If I recall he was around 54-58.

Back in GS3, the fame list was condensed alot more thickly too. It had 10 years of people on it. During the change to GS4, they were wiped, if I recall correctly making it easier to get onto now.

[Xcalibur]

That makes the average levels even better since they removed "ghosts"

Your memory is, once again, wrong.

[Keller]

TAKE IT TO U2US

[HarmNone]

Okay, that's enough. Take your private argument out of the forums. I don't want to close this thread, but I will if this nonsense continues.

[Keller]

I would prefer you close every inane poll thread he starts/resurrects.

But maybe that is just me.

[HarmNone]

Heh. No, Keller, it's not just you. However, there's this little thing called TOS. I merged these threads because they involved the same topic, so this thread now "officially" was started by Zanagodly the Godly. ;)

[Edited on 4-3-2005 by HarmNone]

[Alfster]

Can't you put a clause in the TOS that specifically denies the right of X to start polls?

[HarmNone]

I can't put any clause into TOS. That is the provence of our beloved leader, Kranar. :)

[Keller]

Originally posted by Alfster
Can't you put a clause in the TOS that specifically denies the right of X to start polls? ]

The answer to that question is yes.

I propose an amendment.

Can we have a referendum?

[Hulkein]

I like using a magical rogue.

[HarmNone]

Originally posted by Keller

Originally posted by Alfster
Can't you put a clause in the TOS that specifically denies the right of X to start polls? ]

The answer to that question is yes.

I propose an amendment.

Can we have a referendum?

Ask Kranar. I can't even approve a referendum. :lol:

[Xcalibur]

Originally posted by HarmNone

Originally posted by Keller

Originally posted by Alfster
Can't you put a clause in the TOS that specifically denies the right of X to start polls? ]

The answer to that question is yes.

I propose an amendment.

Can we have a referendum?

Ask Kranar. I can't even approve a referendum. :lol:

Me not posting threads = 500 less pots per day.

Up to you:P

[Alfster]

sounds good to me.

[Xcalibur]

Make a thread about it, if it's 90% o f people's desire, I shall then do it:loveu:

[Alfster]

Nah, that's alright. I haven't seen many polls that were even worht voting for...well that is, other than the "Do you hate X" poll.

That one I liked.

[Xcalibur]

ME too.

[Alfster]

The mods sure didn't.

[Xcalibur]

Remove the "s" of your "mods"

[theotherjohn]

warlock

[Edited on 4-3-2005 by theotherjohn]